The Western Insurance Company v. Cropper et al.

Decision Date01 January 1858
Citation32 Pa. 351
PartiesThe Western Insurance Company v. Cropper et al.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by STRONG, J.

The inquiry raised by the pleadings relates to the extent of the exception inserted in the policy. It is entirely a question of construction. The contract was one of insurance upon the hull, tackle, machinery, and apparel of a steam propeller, but it stipulates for exemption from liability for certain losses. The stipulation was inserted by the underwriters, and was intended for their benefit. If it be obscure, it is their fault. If it be capable of two interpretations, equally reasonable, that must be adopted which is most favourable to the assured, for the language is that of the insurers.

The excepting clause in the policy is in the following words: "It is understood that this company is not liable for any breakage or derangement of the engine, or bursting of the boiler, or any of the parts thereof, or for the effects of fire from any cause connected with the operation of the repair of an engine or boiler, unless the damage be occasioned, and the repairs rendered necessary, by the stranding or sinking of the vessel after her engines and boiler shall have been put in successful operation. It is also understood that this company is not liable for fuel, wages, and provisions, nor for any expense of any delay consequent upon repairs to the engine or boiler, of any kind, or repairs to the hull, if such repairs are rendered necessary by breakage or derangement of machinery, or bursting of boiler."

It is not to be denied that the intention of the parties is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
30 cases
  • Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 7 Mayo 1957
    ...well recognized Pennsylvania rule construing against the insurer any ambiguous provisions of a contract of insurance. See Western Ins. Co. v. Cropper, 1859, 32 Pa. 351; Snader v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co., 1949, 360 Pa. 548, 62 A.2d Order And now, May 7, 1957, it is ordered that jud......
  • National Sur. Co. v. Williams
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 8 Diciembre 1917
    ... ... Bank against the National Surety Company and another ... Judgment for plaintiff, motion for new trial denied, and ... employé, is in effect a 'contract of insurance' to ... which the rules of construction governing ordinary contracts ... Insurance Co., 95 U.S. 673 [24 ... L.Ed. 563]; Western Ins. Co. v. Cropper, 32 Pa. 351, ... 355 [75 Am. Dec. 561]; Reynolds v ... ...
  • Stonsz v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 5 Octubre 1936
    ...a legal presumption to supply the intention of the parties as to the date, that doubt must be resolved in favor of appellee: Western Ins. Co. v. Cropper, 32 Pa. 351; Hillman Transportation Co. v. Home Ins. Co., 268 547. There is here, however, no necessity to apply legal rules of constructi......
  • Penn. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Schmidt
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 2 Abril 1888
    ... ... against the Pennsylvania Mutual Fire Insurance Company, to ... recover upon a policy issued on January 17, 1882, for ... 243; Commonwealth ... Ins. Co. v. Berger, 42 Pa. 285; Western Insurance ... Co. v. Cropper, 32 Pa. 351; S.P. Ins. Co. v ... O'Maley, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT