The Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Steele

Decision Date05 November 1886
Docket Number12,783
Citation9 N.E. 78,108 Ind. 163
PartiesThe Western Union Telegraph Company v. Steele
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

Judgment reversed.

J. E. McDonald, J. M. Butler and A. L. Mason, for appellant.

G. W. Paul, J. E. Humphries, W. E. Humphries, W. M. Reeves and J. S. Zuck, for appellee.

OPINION

Elliott, J.

The appellee instituted this action to recover the penalty imposed for a breach of duty by the statute.

The telegram was delivered to the appellant on the 23d day of May, 1885, and the statute which governs is that enacted in 1885, for that act repeals the earlier one. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Brown, post, p. 538.

The complaint must, therefore, be good under the provisions of the later act.

It is settled law that a penal statute must be strictly construed, and we are, therefore, required to confine the operation of the statute to the cases which it specifies, for we can not extend it by construction. Acting upon this rule, we must hold that the act of 1885 does not prescribe a penalty for neglect in transmitting messages. This conclusion is, indeed, the only one that can be reached without greatly enlarging the words of the statute, and it is strengthened by the fact that the statute which the act of 1885 repeals prescribed a penalty for a negligent breach of duty, while that of 1885 contains no such provision, thus clearly evincing the intention of the Legislature not to give a penalty for a negligent breach of duty.

The act of 1885 prescribes a penalty for a breach of duty only in three cases, bad faith, partiality, discrimination, and the complaint before us shows, at most, a mere neglect of duty, and fails entirely to show bad faith, partiality or discrimination.

Judgment reversed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • State ex rel. Michener v. Harrison
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • December 15, 1888
    ... ... Summers, 108 Ind. 189, 9 N.E. 81, ... and cases there cited; Western U. T. Co. v ... Steele, 108 Ind. 163, 9 N.E. 78; Endlich Interp ... ...
  • State ex rel. Goodman v. Halter
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • September 17, 1897
    ...as if said section had not been repealed by the tax law of 1891. Telegraph Co. v. Brown, 108 Ind. 538, 542, 8 N. E. 171;Telegraph Co. v. Steele, 108 Ind. 163, 9 N. E. 78;Telegraph Co. v. Wilson, 108 Ind. 308, 310, 9 N. E. 172;State v. Helms, 136 Ind. 122, 35 N. E. 893;Bruce v. Cook, 136 Ind......
  • State v. Hagen
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • January 31, 1893
    ... ... give them, are that "the Cigar Makers' International ... Union of America is a voluntary incorporated association of ... practical cigar ... extend it by construction." Western Union Tel ... Co. v. Steele, 108 Ind. 163, 9 N.E. 78 ... ...
  • Evansville & O. Valley Ry. Co. v. Southern Ind. Rural Elec. Corp.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • January 16, 1953
    ...168, 62 N.E. 11; State v. Cleveland, etc. R. Co., 1901, 157 Ind. 288, 290, 61 N.E. 669 and citations; The Western Union Telegraph Company v. Steele, 1886, 108 Ind. 163, 164, 9 N.E. 78; Burgh v. State ex rel. McCormick, 1886, 108 Ind. 132, 134, 9 N.E. 75; Board of Commissioners of Vigo Count......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT