The Wyneric
Decision Date | 07 October 1907 |
Docket Number | 4,878. |
Citation | 156 F. 276 |
Parties | THE WYNERIC. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Oregon |
Giltner & Sewall, for libelant.
Williams Wood & Linthicum, for claimant.
A libel to recover for personal injuries received by libelant while at work stowing lumber in a water ballast tank in the lower hold of the ship Wyneric. Libelant was in the employ of Brown & McCabe, stevedores, who were under contract with the Pacific Export Lumber Company, charterer of the ship, to load her. The charter party represents the ship as being 'ready, with clear holds, to receive cargo, and tight staunch, strong, and in every way fitted for the service having water ballast,' etc. On the day of the accident giving rise to the libel, namely, October 4, 1906, libelant had gone into the tank with Holm, another employe of Brown & McCabe, and the two together had stowed two slings of lumber, so called from the manner in which the lumber was lowered, and, while carrying a timber 3 by 12 inches and 20 feet in length, and placing it in stowage, two planks fell from above, and struck libelant upon the head, causing the injury of which he complains. The tank is described as being 41 feet in length, 18 feet in width at the forward end, and 10 at the other, and from 10 to 12 feet in depth. The hatchway, in dimensions five feet square, is in the corner of the tank. The libelant was carrying the end of the timber farthest from the hatchway, and had proceeded aft along the tank partition to the corner when he was hurt. He testified:
On cross-examination he says:
Andrew Holm, the man who was assisting libelant, corroborates him in the main, but not in detail, being unable to see libelant plainly from where he was. He says that the fall of the planks knocked libelant senseless, but that he came to in about five minutes, and witness helped him out. The libelant states, however, that he ascended the ladders to the upper deck without assistance. The men, finding the light admitted through the hatches insufficient for doing their work conveniently, were furnished with two candles, which were being used at the time; but with these the tank was yet illy lighted.
The tank was provided with a wooden floor, and, from the testimony of the officers of the ship, it appears that two of the planks thereof had been missing for some time, and had not previously been located. In further detail, it appears that the tank contained stanchions running up and down the sides thereof, and iron beams across the top, leaving a space between the beams and the top. The boatswain, being examined as to the possibility of loose boards getting caught above these beams by floating in above them while the tank was full of water, testifies as follows:
The boatswain testifies, further, that on the forenoon preceding the accident he, with three men, went into the tank and cleaned it out; that it was necessary to sweep it down upon the sides and the top because of the slime and rust that would accumulate from the action of the water; that his men were at work in each tank perhaps half an hour; and that they discovered nothing of the plank in question while employed in cleaning out the tank.
As it respects the extent of the injury, libelant testifies that he went to his employer at once after he was hurt, and was sent to Dr. Wheeler, who sewed up and dressed the wound upon his head, but did not examine his back, although he informed the doctor that it was hurt also. This was on the 4th of October. On the 11th or 12th of the same month he went to Dr. Sewall, who, with the assistance of Dr. Tilzer, examined him for injury to the spine. These physicians found no evidence of pain from pressure upon the vertebrae, but a tenderness was discovered in the lumbar region, and, when required to stoop, it was ascertained that libelant favored his back, and hence it was concluded that he had sustained a sprain of the ligaments in the locality designated. It was thought the effect upon the nervous system would be very temporary. When asked whether he thought the injury was permanent, Dr. Sewall answered:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial