Thermopolis Northwest Electric Co. v. Ireland
Decision Date | 06 March 1941 |
Docket Number | No. 2204.,2204. |
Citation | 119 F.2d 409 |
Parties | THERMOPOLIS NORTHWEST ELECTRIC CO. v. IRELAND. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Graddus R. Hagens, of Casper, Wyo. (William J. Wehrli, of Casper, Wyo., on the brief), for appellant.
Jackson M. Seawell, of Denver, Colo. , for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS, BRATTON, and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.
Grace M. Ireland, executrix of the last will and testament of Rufus J. Ireland, deceased, sued The Thermopolis Northwest Electric Company for an accounting and to recover upon a resolution of its board of directors indemnifying Ireland against certain losses. Plaintiff prevailed, and defendant appealed.
Hot Springs Electric Light & Power Company owned and operated a light and power plant at Thermopolis, Wyoming. In December, 1925, Ireland purchased the property of the company at a tax sale for $8,213.33, and a tax sale certificate was issued to him. In February, 1926, he caused Monument Hill Electric Company, a corporation, to be organized with an authorized capital stock of 2,000 shares of the par value of $100 each. The name of the corporation was later changed to Thermopolis Northwest Electric Company. Ireland transferred the tax sale certificate to the corporation and received therefor its note in the exact amount which he had paid for the certificate. The company issued 1997 shares of its stock to Ireland, and the remaining 3 shares to qualifying directors. In consideration for the stock issued to him, Ireland was to secure and did secure for the corporation a new franchise from the town, a contract to light the streets and alleys of the town, a certificate of convenience and necessity from the public service commission of the state, and a contract to obtain electric energy from Northwest Transmission Company. Ireland advanced to the company about $10,000 in cash and it went forward with the business. In October, 1926, the directors of the company adopted a resolution in this language:
At the time of the adoption of the resolution, a suit was pending in the United States Court for Wyoming in which Henry T. Clarke, owner of certain bonds issued by Hot Springs Electric Light & Power Company, was plaintiff and Ireland and others were defendants. Clarke sought on behalf of himself and other bondholders to have the tax sale vacated, the transfer of the certificate set aside, and certain asserted rights of the bondholders protected and enforced. That suit was dismissed without prejudice and a very similar suit was subsequently instituted in the same court. It was determined in that action that the attempted tax sale was invalid, but that instead of setting aside all of the transactions which had preceded that determination, the bondholders should have judgment against Ireland and the Thermopolis Company in such sum as the court should find upon further hearing to be the value of the property and business of the Hot Springs Company. This court affirmed the decree, with a modification in respect to costs. Clarke v. Hot Springs Electric Light & Power Co., 10 Cir., 55 F.2d 612. The district court determined on the further hearing that the value of the property and business was $92,160; and that amount was on behalf of the Thermopolis Company paid into the registry of the court and distributed pro rata among the bondholders. The Hot Springs Company, and Thomas J. Cuff, trustee for owners of other bonds of the Hot Springs Company, filed a suit against Ireland in the supreme court of Nassau County, New York, in which recovery was sought for more than $200,000. Henry T. Clarke and John T. Clarke intervened in that action. Ireland appealed without avail from an adverse ruling upon his motion for summary judgment. Hot Springs Electric Light & Power Co. and Cuff v. Ireland, 241 App.Div. 738, 270 N.Y.S. 952. Shortly thereafter, Ireland died, and the executrix of his last will and testament subsequently compromised and settled that case as to Cuff for $20,000 in cash.
The court below found, among other things, that after the adoption of the resolution Ireland expended various amounts defending himself in the second Clarke suit, aggregating $12,108.19; that he also spent various amounts defending himself in the Cuff suit, and finally paid $20,000 to settle and compromise it; that the settlement suit was reasonable and advisable; that in the adoption of the resolution, the defendant intended to indemnify Ireland against such expenditures; and that each and all of such expenditures were reasonable, bona fide, and covered by the resolution. Judgment went for $59,288.29, being the aggregate of the expenditures in the two cases.
The finding of the court that in the adoption of the resolution it was the intention of the defendant to indemnify Ireland against expenditures of the kind made in the second Clarke suit and in the Cuff suit is challenged. It is contended that the resolution is clear and unambiguous; that it cannot be varied by parol...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBride
...prudent under the circumstances. See Luton Mining Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 276 Ky. 321, 123 S.W.2d 1055; Thermopolis Northwest Electric Co. v. Ireland, 10 Cir., 119 F.2d 409; St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 201 U.S. 173, 26 S.Ct. 400, 50 L.Ed. 712.' (E......
-
Blake Const. Co., Inc. v. United States
...219 Wis. 373, 263 N.W. 184 (1935); Atlanta Milling Co. v. Norris Grain Co., 271 F.2d 453 (5 Cir. 1959); Thermopolis Northwest Electric Co. v. Ireland, 119 F.2d 409 (10 Cir. 1941); McStain Corporation v. Elfline Plumbing & Heating, 558 P.2d 588 Blake argues that there was no party wall in ex......
-
Anheuser-Busch v. Grovier-Starr Produce Co.
...on appeal. United States v. McCain, 10 Cir., 118 F.2d 479; Sauder v. Dittmar, 10 Cir., 118 F.2d 524; Thermopolis Northwest Electric Co. v. Ireland, 10 Cir., 119 F.2d 409; Thatenhorst v. United States, 10 Cir., 119 F.2d 567; Scott v. Beams, 10 Cir., 122 F.2d 777; American Employers' Ins. Co.......
-
Levenson v. Mobley
...not have settled while the NALD audit was unresolved, and, in this sense, the settlement was voluntary. In Thermopolis Northwest Electric Co. v. Ireland, 119 F.2d 409 (10th Cir.1941), the court was asked whether "the sum paid in compromise and settlement of [a] * * * suit was voluntarily pa......