Thomas Boswell Lessee, Plaintiff v. Lucius Otis, Administrator Margaret Dickinson, Widow and Edward Julia Margaret John Rodolphus, Martha Jane, and James Dickinson, Minor Children, of Rodolphus Dickinson, Deceased By Rawson, Their Guardian and Next Friend, Et Al
Decision Date | 01 January 1850 |
Citation | 50 U.S. 336,13 L.Ed. 164,9 How. 336 |
Parties | THOMAS E. BOSWELL'S LESSEE, PLAINTIFF, v. LUCIUS B. OTIS, ADMINISTRATOR, MARGARET DICKINSON, WIDOW, AND EDWARD F., JULIA S., MARGARET O., JOHN B. B., RODOLPHUS, MARTHA JANE, AND JAMES A. DICKINSON, MINOR CHILDREN, OF RODOLPHUS DICKINSON, DECEASED, BY L. O. RAWSON, THEIR GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND, ET AL |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial132 cases
-
Shaffer v. Heitner
...was firmly established at the time of Pennoyer. See, e. g., D'Arcy v. Ketchum, 11 How. 165, 13 L.Ed. 648 (1851); Boswell's Lessee v. Otis, 9 How. 336, 13 L.Ed. 164 (1850); Kibbe v. Kibbe, 1 Kirby 119 (Conn.Super.Ct.1786). 16 Attachment was considered essential to the state court's jurisdict......
-
Mabee v. McDonald
...Union, and their validity and force has been almost universally recognized within the jurisdiction where they are rendered. Boswell's Lessee v. Otis, 9 How. 350 ; Oakley v. Aspinwall, 4 N. Y. 513; Nations v. Johnson, 24 How. 203 ; Freeman on Judgments, § 127. * * * In this case there are th......
-
Krumenacker v. Andis
...543, 153 N. W. 274;Roberts v. Enderlin Investment Co., 21 N. D. 594, 132 N. W. 145; Black on Judgments (2d Ed.) § 232; Boswell v. Otis, 9 How. 336, 350, 13 L. Ed. 164;Braly v. Seaman, 30 Cal. 611;Barber v. Norris, 37 Minn. 194, 33 N. W. 559, 5 Am. St. Rep. 836. The affidavit for publication......
-
St. Sava Mission Corp. v. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese
...[territorial] jurisdiction of the court.' " (Pennoyer v. Neff (1877) 95 U.S. 714, 724, 24 L.Ed. 565, 569, quoting from Boswell v. Otis (1850) 9 How. 336, 13 L.Ed. 164.) The second kind of jurisdiction--over property located within a state--is called in rem jurisdiction. (See Hanson v. Denck......
Request a trial to view additional results