Thomas Boswell Lessee, Plaintiff v. Lucius Otis, Administrator Margaret Dickinson, Widow and Edward Julia Margaret John Rodolphus, Martha Jane, and James Dickinson, Minor Children, of Rodolphus Dickinson, Deceased By Rawson, Their Guardian and Next Friend, Et Al

Decision Date01 January 1850
Citation50 U.S. 336,13 L.Ed. 164,9 How. 336
PartiesTHOMAS E. BOSWELL'S LESSEE, PLAINTIFF, v. LUCIUS B. OTIS, ADMINISTRATOR, MARGARET DICKINSON, WIDOW, AND EDWARD F., JULIA S., MARGARET O., JOHN B. B., RODOLPHUS, MARTHA JANE, AND JAMES A. DICKINSON, MINOR CHILDREN, OF RODOLPHUS DICKINSON, DECEASED, BY L. O. RAWSON, THEIR GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND, ET AL
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

To continue reading

Request your trial
132 cases
  • Shaffer v. Heitner
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 24, 1977
    ...was firmly established at the time of Pennoyer. See, e. g., D'Arcy v. Ketchum, 11 How. 165, 13 L.Ed. 648 (1851); Boswell's Lessee v. Otis, 9 How. 336, 13 L.Ed. 164 (1850); Kibbe v. Kibbe, 1 Kirby 119 (Conn.Super.Ct.1786). 16 Attachment was considered essential to the state court's jurisdict......
  • Mabee v. McDonald
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • April 14, 1915
    ...Union, and their validity and force has been almost universally recognized within the jurisdiction where they are rendered. Boswell's Lessee v. Otis, 9 How. 350 ; Oakley v. Aspinwall, 4 N. Y. 513; Nations v. Johnson, 24 How. 203 ; Freeman on Judgments, § 127. * * * In this case there are th......
  • Krumenacker v. Andis
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • December 14, 1917
    ...543, 153 N. W. 274;Roberts v. Enderlin Investment Co., 21 N. D. 594, 132 N. W. 145; Black on Judgments (2d Ed.) § 232; Boswell v. Otis, 9 How. 336, 350, 13 L. Ed. 164;Braly v. Seaman, 30 Cal. 611;Barber v. Norris, 37 Minn. 194, 33 N. W. 559, 5 Am. St. Rep. 836. The affidavit for publication......
  • St. Sava Mission Corp. v. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • September 19, 1990
    ...[territorial] jurisdiction of the court.' " (Pennoyer v. Neff (1877) 95 U.S. 714, 724, 24 L.Ed. 565, 569, quoting from Boswell v. Otis (1850) 9 How. 336, 13 L.Ed. 164.) The second kind of jurisdiction--over property located within a state--is called in rem jurisdiction. (See Hanson v. Denck......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Mcle Self-study Article Tips of the Trade: Why Over-notice? Because Due Process Might Demand It.
    • United States
    • California Lawyers Association California Trusts & Estates Quarterly (CLA) No. 28-4, June 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...which is adjacent to the U.S. Army post of Fort Knox. (as of Sept. 10, 2022).2. U.S. Const., 14th Amend.3. Boswell's Lessee v. Otis (1850) 50 U.S. 336, 348.4. Estate of Lacy (1975) 54 Cal.App.3d 172, 187; see Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co. (1950) 339 U.S. 306, 312-313.5. Gill v. Pe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT