Thomas v. Atl. Coast Line R.Co

Decision Date25 April 1910
PartiesTHOMAS v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE R.CO.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Carriers (§ 76*)—Shipment of Goods—Action by Consignee.

One who was required by a carrier to pay freight on goods represented in the bill of lading to be of a specified quality, and who was responsible for the goods, was properly considered as consignee for value or as one who had incur red liability as consignee, authorizing him to sue for any shortage.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Carriers, Cent. Dig. §§ 261, 266, 269; Dec. Dig. § 76.*]

On petition for rehearing. Dismissed. For former opinion, see 64 S. E. 220.

PER CURIAM. After careful consideration the court fails to discover that any material matter of law or fact has been overlooked or disregarded.

The case, at folio 8, shows that the plaintiff was required by defendant to pay freight on the number of sacks of meal represented in the bill of lading without qualification to be 600, and, at folio 11, it appears that plaintiff was responsible for the meal. Hence the court was authorized to consider plaintiff as a consignee for value, or as one who had incurred loss and liability as consignee.

It is therefore ordered that the petition herein be dismissed, and the order heretofore granted staying remittitur be revoked.

*. For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Reporter Indexes

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Daughty v. Northwestern R. Co. of South Carolina
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 2, 1912
    ... ... April 30, 1911, the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company ... issued its bill of lading to S ... Salley v. S. A. L., 76 S.C. 173, 56 S.E. 782; ... Thomas v. Railroad Co., 85 S.C. 537, 64 S.E. 220, 67 ... S.E ... ...
  • Daughty v. Nw. R. Co. Of South Carolina
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 2, 1912
  • Gleason v. Bamberg
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 12, 1923
    ...the bill causes loss to a transferee in good faith, for value, by reason of a deficiency, the carrier is estopped. Thomas v. Railroad Co., 85 S. C. 537, 64 S. E. 220, 67 S. E. 908, 34 D. R. A. (N. S.) 1177, 21 Ann. Cas. 223; Smith v. Railroad Co., 89 S. C. 415, 71 S. E. 989. The judgment of......
  • THE PELOTAS
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • September 7, 1933
    ... ... to New Orleans at Point Galera, skirted the northern coast of Venezuela to La Guaira, and, after traveling an extra ... Thomas v. A. C. L. R. Co., 85 S. C. 537, 64 S. E. 220, 67 S. E ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT