Thomas v. Com., s. 0418-91-1

Decision Date07 June 1994
Docket Number0420-91-1,Nos. 0418-91-1,s. 0418-91-1
PartiesDemetris THOMAS, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee. (Two Cases) Record
CourtVirginia Court of Appeals

James B. Covington, Norfolk (Breeden, MacMillan & Green, P.L.C., on briefs), for appellant.

Eugene Murphy, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Stephen D. Rosenthal, Atty. Gen., on brief), for appellee.

Before MOON, C.J., and BAKER, BARROW, BENTON, COLEMAN, KOONTZ, WILLIS, ELDER and FITZPATRICK, JJ.

UPON A REHEARING EN BANC

On August 3, 1993 a panel of this Court reversed the convictions of Demetris Thomas with respect to alleged crimes against the dwelling and person of Sandra Harris. See Thomas v. Commonwealth, 16 Va.App. 851, 434 S.E.2d 319 (1993). In an unpublished opinion dated August 3, 1993, the same panel affirmed Thomas's convictions with respect to crimes against Sherry Dickinson. See Thomas v. Commonwealth, Record No. 0418-91-1, 1993 WL 291659. Thomas's petitions for rehearing en banc were granted, the cases were consolidated, and the issues were heard on February 18, 1994.

For the reasons stated in the panel's published opinion, a majority of the Court reverses the judgment of the trial court with respect to the alleged crimes against the dwelling and person of Sandra Harris because Thomas was improperly impeached by evidence of still pending prosecutions. See Dowell v. Commonwealth, 12 Va.App. 1145, 1149, 408 S.E.2d 263, 265 (1991), aff'd en banc, 14 Va.App. 58, 414 S.E.2d 440 (1992). On all remaining issues, a majority of the Court affirms the actions of the trial court for the reasons stated in the panel's opinions. Accordingly, the stays of this Court's August 3, 1993 mandates are lifted, and their directives are reinstated.

Judge Barrow concurs in the result but would not address issues concerning Thomas's initial detention addressed in the published opinion because, in his judgment, the trial court's determination that Thomas accompanied the officer voluntarily should have been granted deference.

Judge Benton would reverse both judgments of the trial court for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions to the original panel decisions. See 16 Va.App. at 861-868, 434 S.E.2d at 326-30.

The trial court shall allow court-appointed counsel for the appellant an additional $200 for services rendered the appellant on the rehearing portion of these appeals, in addition to his costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. One-half of this amount shall...

To continue reading

Request your trial
32 cases
  • Jackson v. Com.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • 4 Febrero 2003
    ...reasonably warrant it. See generally Thomas v. Commonwealth, 16 Va.App. 851, 857, 434 S.E.2d 319, 323 (1993), aff'd en banc, 18 Va.App. 454, 444 S.E.2d 275 (1994). A Terry stop a police investigation "at close range," when the officer remains particularly vulnerable in part because a full c......
  • Jackson v. Com.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • 29 Julio 2003
    ...reasonably warrant it. See generally Thomas v. Commonwealth, 16 Va.App. 851, 857, 434 S.E.2d 319, 323 (1993), aff'd en banc, 18 Va.App. 454, 444 S.E.2d 275 (1994). A Terry stop involves "a police investigation `at close range,' when the officer remains particularly vulnerable in part becaus......
  • Ford v. Com.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • 1 Septiembre 1998
    ...narcotics dog is permissible); Thomas v. Commonwealth, 16 Va.App. 851, 856-57, 434 S.E.2d 319, 322-23 (1993), aff'd, 18 Va. App. 454, 444 S.E.2d 275 (1994) (en banc) (lawful to handcuff and transport suspect in police vehicle to victim's house for identification); Burgess v. Commonwealth, 1......
  • Harris v. Com.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • 16 Junio 1998
    ...under the circumstances. See Thomas v. Commonwealth, 16 Va.App. 851, 857, 434 S.E.2d 319, 323 (1993), aff'd en banc, 18 Va.App. 454, 444 S.E.2d 275 (1994). Trooper Jones' display of his firearm for less than a minute prior to the arrival of the other troopers was a reasonable response to ap......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT