Thomas v. Thomas
| Decision Date | 08 July 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. 96-04150,96-04150 |
| Citation | 712 So.2d 822 |
| Parties | 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1635 Rickey N. THOMAS, Appellant, v. Ruth M. THOMAS, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Sumlar v. Sumlar
...support. To support her position, Appellant relies on Bryan v. Bryan, 765 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Cooper; and Thomas v. Thomas, 712 So.2d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). In Bryan, we recognized that pursuant to section 61.30(2), fair rental value is a factor to be considered in determining "......
-
Bryan v. Bryan
...So.2d 1154 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Chapoteau v. Chapoteau, 659 So.2d 1381 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). The appellant also relies on Thomas v. Thomas, 712 So.2d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), where, in the course of dissolution proceedings, the trial court declared the parties tenants in common of the former ma......
-
Schafstall v. Schafstall
...George v. George , 93 So.3d 464, 468 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) ; Bryan v. Bryan , 765 So.2d 829, 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) ; Thomas v. Thomas , 712 So.2d 822, 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) ; Chapoteau v. Chapoteau , 659 So.2d 1381, 1384 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).In the instant case, it was not only proper, but it......
-
Mitchell v. Mitchell
...See Bryan v. Bryan, 765 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Cooper v. Cooper, 760 So.2d 1048, 1049 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Thomas v. Thomas, 712 So.2d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). In summary: 1. We reverse the inclusion of the Carrollwood and North Carolina properties in the equitable distribution scheme......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Equitable distribution and property issues
...under section 61.30(2)(a) ( see Chapter 16) as in-kind payments to the extent that they reduce living expenses. [ Thomas v. Thomas, 712 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).] It seems when there are no children of the marriage, there is a new standard that there must be a “special purpose” for an ......