Thompson Et Al v. Bowman
Decision Date | 01 December 1867 |
Citation | 18 L.Ed. 736,73 U.S. 316,6 Wall. 316 |
Parties | THOMPSON ET AL. v. BOWMAN |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
ERROR to the District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi.
Thompson, Ford, and Powell, being owners of real estate in Texas, Powell agreed with one Bowman, that if he would find a purchaser, he should have a commission of ten per cent. on a sale. Bowman found a purchaser, and the commission not being paid, he brought suit for it, the suit in the court below.
In charging the jury, the court assumed, without any proof upon the point, that the defendants were partners in the ownership of the property, and instructed them that each partner was the agent of all the partners composing the firm of which he is a member; and had a right to sell all the partnership property, real or personal, and to employ agents to sell it and to bind the firm by an agreement to give such agent a commission for selling it. It allowed a witness produced for that purpose to prove 'that it was admitted by the defendant Powell, after the lands belonging to the defendants, in respect of which the commissions sued for in this cause are claimed, had all been sold, that he, the said Powell, had agreed, prior to the said sale, to pay the plaintiff ten per cent. upon the amount of the proceeds of the sale of the said lands, if he, the plaintiff, would find or introduce a purchaser for them; to the introduction of which testimony, the defendant Thompson, by his counsel, objected, but the court overruled the objection.'
The case was here on exception to the admission of this testimony and to the charge.
Messrs. Carlisle, Ashton, and Black, for the plaintiff in error; Mr. Reverdy Johnson, contra.
Mr. Justice FIELD, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court, as follows:
There is no doubt that a copartnership may exist in the purchase and sale of real property, equally as in any other lawful business. Nor is there any doubt that each member of such copartnership possesses full authority to contract for the sale or other disposition of its entire property, though for technical reasons the legal title vested in all the copartners can only be transferred by their joint act. But the fact that real property is held in the joint names of several owners, or in the name of one for the benefit of all, is no evidence of copartnership between them with respect to it. In the absence of proof of its purchase with partnership funds for partnership purposes, real property standing in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Green v. Whaley
... ... 636; ... Taylor v. Hudson, 145 Mo.App. 377; Sharkey v ... McDermott, 91 Mo. 647; Wright v. Tinsley, 30 ... Mo. 389; Merrill v. Thompson, 252 Mo. 714; Clark ... v. Cordy, 69 Mo.App. 6; Gupton v. Gupton, 47 ... Mo. 37; Sutton v. Haydon, 62 Mo. 101; Wellington ... v. Apthorp, ... 774, 781-2, 118 P. 253; In re Swift, 118 F ... 348; Brown v. O'Brien, 4 Neb. 194; Shafer's ... Appeal, 106 Pa. 49, 56; Thompson v. Bowman, 73 U.S ... 316, 18 L.Ed. 736; Robinson Bank v. Miller, 27 ... L.R.A. 449; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 81 Ark. 68, 98 S.W ... 685; Allen & ... ...
-
Takoma Park Bank, Inc. v. Abbott
... ... Williamson v. Dillon, 1 Har. & G. 444; Hagan v ... Hendry, 18 Md. 177; Knight v. House, 29 Md ... 194, 96 Am.Dec. 515; Thompson v. Bowman, 6 Wall ... 316, 18 L.Ed. 736; Jones v. Dugan, 124 Md. 346, at ... page 350, 92 A. 775; Walkling v. Walkling, 162 Md ... 188, ... ...
-
Green v. Whaley.
...In re Swift (D. C.) 118 Fed. 348; Brown v. O'Brien, 4 Neb. 195; In re Shafer's Appeal, 106 Pa. 49, loc. cit. 56; Thompson v. Bowman, 73 U. S. (6 Wall.) 316, 18 L. Ed. 736; Robinson Bank v. Miller, 153 Ill. 244, 38 N. E. 1078, 27 L. R. A. 449, 46 Am. St. Rep. 883; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 81 Ark.......
-
White v. Moore
... ... in 1908, and the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United ... States in the cases of Bell v. Morrison, 1 Pet. 351, ... 7 L.Ed. 174, Thompson v. Bowman, 6 Wall. 316, 18 ... L.Ed. 736, and Hall v. Lanning, 91 U.S. 160, 23 ... L.Ed. 271. Each of these cases is readily distinguishable ... ...