Thompson v. Commissioner
Decision Date | 20 July 1964 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 3598-62. |
Parties | James G. Thompson v. Commissioner. |
Court | U.S. Tax Court |
Carl A. Stutsman, Jr., 411 W. 5th St., Los Angeles, Calif, and Jack R. White, for the petitioner. Thomas F. Greaves, for the respondent.
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
The Commissioner determined deficiencies in petitioner's income tax, as follows:
Taxable Year Amount 1956................ $28,480.01 1957................ 21,444.79 1958................ 41,640.75 1959................ 25,597.95 1960................ 23,286.57
The parties have agreed to certain adjustments with respect to the deficiencies.
The remaining issues for decision are: (1) Whether the sum of $200,000 payable to petitioner by virtue of a certain agreement executed in March 1956 constitutes ordinary income or long-term capital gain; (2) whether, in the year 1960, petitioner received additional interest income in the amount of $7,767.87; (3) whether petitioner, in the year 1958, suffered a "theft" loss in the amount of $23,000; and (4) whether petitioner is entitled to claim business deductions for entertainment, yachting, and travel in the year 1956.
Some of the facts have been stipulated, and the stipulations of facts, together with the exhibits attached thereto, are incorporated herein by this reference.
Petitioner resided in Huntington Park, California, during the years involved herein. He filed his individual income tax returns computed on a cash basis for the taxable years involved with the district director of internal revenue at Los Angeles, California.
Tapered Air Products Corp. (hereinafter referred to as Tapered) was a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California. Tapered was organized for the purpose of engaging in the business of milling aluminum sheets into aircraft wings with machinery and equipment designed by petitioner. The stock of Tapered was owned 70 percent by petitioner, 15 percent by Gust Fotis (hereinafter referred to as Fotis), and 15 percent by Victor Kaytis (hereinafter referred to as Kaytis).
Aero Tool Sales Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Aero) was a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California. It was organized for the purpose of owning and renting to Tapered the machinery and equipment used to manufacture aircraft wings. All of the stock of Aero was owned by petitioner.
Avi-Air, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as Avi-Air) was a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California. The controlling stockholders of Avi-Air for all purposes material hereto were Lloyd L. Hill (hereinafter referred to as Hill) and Oliver M. Bell (hereinafter referred to as Bell). Petitioner is not in any way related to Hill or Bell.
On October 7, 1955, petitioner entered into a written agreement with Avi-Air, Hill, and Bell for the sale by petitioner to Avi-Air of all the stock owned by petitioner in Tapered and all of the stock of Aero. The total purchase price was $1,150,000, payable $70,000 currently with the execution of the contract and the balance, $1,080,000, to be paid over a period of eight years. A promissory note bearing 4½ percent interest and secured by a chattel mortgage on the equipment owned by Tapered and Aero as well as a pledge of the stock of the two corporations was executed by Avi-Air.
The agreement provided, in part, as follows:
In connection herewith, it is recognized by and between the parties that underlying the capital stock purchased hereby are certain machines and equipment of advanced and specialized design and it is agreed by and between the parties that the fair market value of said machinery and equipment of Tapered Air Products Corp. and Aero Tool Sales Corporation is $1,150,000.00 and the net working capital is approximately $150,000.00. The parties further agree that in view of the fact that the companies are wholly engaged in defense industries and the contracts are awarded on a competitive bid basis no goodwill exists or was contemplated in the valuation and sale of the stock hereby.
The sales agreement did not contain a provision prohibiting petitioner from competing with Avi-Air. However, the employment agreement, infra, did contain such a clause. In addition to said agreement for the sale of stock and as part of the same transaction, petitioner and Avi-Air entered into numerous other agreements and contracts dated October 7, 1955. One such contract was an employment contract whereby petitioner was to be employed by Avi-Air. It was Avi-Air's idea to obtain the services of petitioner. The equipment and machinery of Tapered and Aero had been designed by him. He had selected and trained the employees of Tapered. It was felt by Avi-Air that the services of petitioner would be necessary for a transitional period. The pertinent parts of the employment contract are as follows:
This contract was amended so that the rendering by petitioner of his services six days a month would constitute full performance of his obligations.
The following collateral agreement was also executed on October 7, 1955:
/s/ JAMES G. THOMPSON AVI-AIR, INC., a California corporation By: /s/ O. M. Bell, Pres. By: /s/ L. L. Hill, Sec.
Also on October 7, 1955, the following collateral agreement was executed:
To continue reading
Request your trial