Thompson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., LLC, No. 08-2077.

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtWilliams
Citation566 F.3d 699
PartiesTheodore A. THOMPSON, Debtor-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, LLC, Creditor-Appellee.
Docket NumberNo. 08-2077.
Decision Date27 May 2009
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
110 cases
  • In re Shannon, Case No. 18 B 04116
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Seventh Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 7 Septiembre 2018
    ...a chapter 13 debtor's vehicle before the petition date to return the vehicle as soon as the petition is filed. See Thompson v. GMAC, LLC , 566 F.3d 699 (7th Cir. 2009). Shannon notes that the City relies on a decision of one bankruptcy judge in this district who concluded that the exception......
  • In re Ludkowski, Case No. 16bk09485
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Seventh Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 24 Julio 2018
    ...ruled that inaction can be an action when it comes to a violation of the automatic stay. Thompson v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., LLC , 566 F.3d 699, 706-07 (7th Cir. 2009). In Thompson , the Seventh Circuit stated that a creditor in possession of estate assets acquired prepetition violate......
  • Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Arcapita Bank B.S.C.(c) v. Bahr. Islamic Bank (In re Arcapita Bank B.S.C.(c)), Case No. 12-11076 (SHL)
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Second Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • 23 Abril 2021
    ...influence over' or 'to have power over.'" In re Weidenbenner, 521 B.R. 74, 79 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting Thompson v. GMAC, LLC, 566 F.3d 699, 702 (7th Cir. 2009) ("Holding onto an asset, refusing to return it, and otherwise prohibiting a debtor's beneficial use of an asset all fit with......
  • Colonial Penniman, LLC v. John Williams, Maxine Williams, Evb, Successor By Merger to Va. Co. (In re Colonial Penniman, LLC), Case No. 16–50394–FJS
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Fourth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • 18 Agosto 2017
    ...160, 170 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2008) ; see also In re Weidenbenner , 521 B.R. 74, 79 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting Thompson v. GMAC, LLC , 566 F.3d 699, 702 (7th Cir. 2009) ) (explaining that "to ‘exercise control’ is ‘to exercise restraining or directing influence over’ or ‘to have power ove......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • THE IMPENDING COLLISION OF SMART CONTRACTS AND THE AUTOMATIC STAY.
    • United States
    • Notre Dame Law Review Vol. 97 Nbr. 3, March 2022
    • 1 Marzo 2022
    ...(45) Circuit cases holding that retention of debtor property violates [section] 362(a)(3): Thompson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 566 F.3d 699 (7th Cir. 2009); Weber v. SEFCU (In re Weber), 719 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2013); Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Rozier (In re Rozier), 376 F.3d 1323 (11......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT