Thompson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., LLC, No. 08-2077.
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit) |
Writing for the Court | Williams |
Citation | 566 F.3d 699 |
Parties | Theodore A. THOMPSON, Debtor-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, LLC, Creditor-Appellee. |
Docket Number | No. 08-2077. |
Decision Date | 27 May 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
110 cases
-
In re Shannon, Case No. 18 B 04116
...a chapter 13 debtor's vehicle before the petition date to return the vehicle as soon as the petition is filed. See Thompson v. GMAC, LLC , 566 F.3d 699 (7th Cir. 2009). Shannon notes that the City relies on a decision of one bankruptcy judge in this district who concluded that the exception......
-
In re Ludkowski, Case No. 16bk09485
...ruled that inaction can be an action when it comes to a violation of the automatic stay. Thompson v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., LLC , 566 F.3d 699, 706-07 (7th Cir. 2009). In Thompson , the Seventh Circuit stated that a creditor in possession of estate assets acquired prepetition violate......
-
Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Arcapita Bank B.S.C.(c) v. Bahr. Islamic Bank (In re Arcapita Bank B.S.C.(c)), Case No. 12-11076 (SHL)
...influence over' or 'to have power over.'" In re Weidenbenner, 521 B.R. 74, 79 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting Thompson v. GMAC, LLC, 566 F.3d 699, 702 (7th Cir. 2009) ("Holding onto an asset, refusing to return it, and otherwise prohibiting a debtor's beneficial use of an asset all fit with......
-
Colonial Penniman, LLC v. John Williams, Maxine Williams, Evb, Successor By Merger to Va. Co. (In re Colonial Penniman, LLC), Case No. 16–50394–FJS
...160, 170 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2008) ; see also In re Weidenbenner , 521 B.R. 74, 79 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting Thompson v. GMAC, LLC , 566 F.3d 699, 702 (7th Cir. 2009) ) (explaining that "to ‘exercise control’ is ‘to exercise restraining or directing influence over’ or ‘to have power ove......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
THE IMPENDING COLLISION OF SMART CONTRACTS AND THE AUTOMATIC STAY.
...(45) Circuit cases holding that retention of debtor property violates [section] 362(a)(3): Thompson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 566 F.3d 699 (7th Cir. 2009); Weber v. SEFCU (In re Weber), 719 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2013); Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Rozier (In re Rozier), 376 F.3d 1323 (11......