Thompson v. Heineman
| Docket Number | S-14-158 |
| Decision Date | 09 January 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
10 cases
-
Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Dunavan (In re Application No. Op-0003)
...the affirmative.At the outset, we observe that this appeal comes to us in a completely different legal framework than we confronted in Thompson v. Heineman .1 While both cases involve the statutory process for obtaining route approval of an oil pipeline, the issues in this appeal are distin......
-
Estermann v. Bose
...except through the sovereign powers of taxation and eminent domain, both of which must be for a public purpose. Thompson v. Heineman , 289 Neb. 798, 857 N.W.2d 731 (2015). See, also, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Chaulk , 262 Neb. 235, 631 N.W.2d 131 (2001) ; Burger v. City of Bea......
-
Sanitary & Improvement Dist. No. 67 of Sarpy Cnty. v. Neb. Dep't of Rds.
...v. State , 298 Neb. 445, 905 N.W.2d 38 (2017).22 See, Estermann v. Bose , 296 Neb. 228, 892 N.W.2d 857 (2017) ; Thompson v. Heineman , 289 Neb. 798, 857 N.W.2d 731 (2015).23 See Knick, supra note 20.24 See Edwards v. Douglas County , 308 Neb. 259, 953 N.W.2d 744 (2021).25 Brief for appellee......
-
Griffith v. Neb. Dep't of Corr. Servs.
...that a plaintiff demonstrate an injury in fact that is actual, imminent, concrete, and particularized. See, Thompson v. Heineman , 289 Neb. 798, 814, 857 N.W.2d 731, 747 (2015) (describing taxpayer standing as "exception to the injury-in-fact requirement"); Chambers v. Lautenbaugh , 263 Neb......
Get Started for Free