Thompson v. Katzer
Decision Date | 06 November 1997 |
Citation | 133 Wn.2d 1020,948 P.2d 387 |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Parties | Robert A. Thompson v. Ronald Katzer, Ann Katzer, Buell Berg, Agent of Ronald Katzer, Ann Katzer NO. 65621-5 |
To continue reading
Request your trial5 cases
-
Home v. North Kitsap School Dist.
... ... We next consider whether Home was an invitee or licensee. As we explained in Thompson v. Katzer, 16 "An invitee is either a public invitee or a business visitor." 17 "A public invitee is a person who is invited to enter or remain ... ...
-
Beebe v. Moses, 20348-4-III.
... ... and occupier, from (2) an entry made for a purpose that either (a) benefits only the entrant or (b) is primarily familial or social." Thompson v. Katzer, 86 Wash.App. 280, 286, 936 P.2d 421, review denied, 133 Wash.2d 1020, 948 P.2d 387 (1997); see Swanson v. McKain, 59 Wash. App. 303, ... ...
-
Dale v. G. Wolf Enter.s Inc
... ... To determine if an entrant is a business invitee, an important consideration is whether the entrant bestowed an economic benefit. Thompson v. Katzer, 86 Wn. App. 280, 286, 936 P.2d 421, review denied, 133 Wn.2d 1020 (1997). Additionally, "there must be some real or supposed mutuality of ... ...
-
Nelson v. G. Wolf Enterprises, Inc.
... ... consideration is whether the entrant bestowed an economic ... benefit. Thompson v. Katzer, 86 Wn.App. 280, 286, ... 936 P.2d 421, review denied, 133 Wn.2d 1020 (1997) ... Additionally, "there must be some real or ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...v. Hunstad, 53 Wn.2d 87, 330 P.2d 1007 (1958): 2.5(2)(c), 2.5(5)(a) Thompson v. Katzer, 86 Wn. App. 280, 936 P.2d 421, review denied, 133 Wn.2d 1020 (1997): 4.5(1)(a) Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn.2d 570, 343 P.2d 183 (1959): 7.3(7), 7.3(13), 7.3(20) Thornely v. Andrews, 40 W......
-
§4.5 - The Status of the Entrant as Invitee, Licensee, or Trespasser
...v. Moses, 113 Wn.App. 464, 467-68, 54 P.3d 188 (2002) (quoting Thompson v. Katzer, 86 Wn.App. 280, 286, 936 P.2d 421, review denied, 133 Wn.2d 1020 (1997)). Even under the broader definition of invitee, the question of whether a person is an invitee or a licensee continues to arise in the c......