Thompson v. Maddux
| Decision Date | 15 January 1895 |
| Citation | Thompson v. Maddux, 105 Ala. 326, 16 So. 885 (Ala. 1895) |
| Parties | THOMPSON ET AL. v. MADDUX. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from chancery court, Bullock county; Jere N. Williams Chancellor.
Action by Thomas J. Maddux against W. I. R. Thompson and others to enjoin defendants from foreclosing a mortgage.A decision was rendered for plaintiff, referring it to the register to state the account between the parties, and defendants appeal.Appeal dismissed.
The complainant averred in his bill that he had been for a long time a customer of Jordan & Sons, a mercantile firm doing business at Midway, in Bullock county, and that for 10 years Jordan & Sons had been advancing to him, for the purpose of enabling him to make a crop, and to secure such advances he at the first of each year, executed his note, which evidenced any balance that might be due on the last year's account and the approximate advances that were to be made during the coming year; that, in accordance with this custom, he did, in January, 1892, execute his note to Jordan & Sons for $3,000 which amount included the balance due from him for the transactions of 10 years preceding that time, and the amount which was estimated to be necessary to enable him to make his crop during the current year; and that to secure this amount he executed a mortgage on his real estate and personal property, and that this mortgage was assigned by Jordan & Sons to Robinson & Thompson.It was also averred in the bill that, for the past advances made by Jordan & Sons to the complainant, they had charged him usurious interest, and that up to the time of the assignment to Robinson & Thompson there had been no advances made to the complainant.He also averred his willingness and readiness to pay any amount that might be due upon said mortgage, and then averred that, under the provisions of sale in said mortgage, W. I. R. Thompson, as surviving partner of Robinson & Thompson, was about...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Shell Oil Co. v. Edwards, 6 Div. 620
...of the city commission, adopted September 10, 1950, is valid in all respects. But there was no decree to that effect. Thompson v. Maddux, 105 Ala. 326, 16 So. 885; Hill v. Hill, 211 Ala. 293, 100 So. 340; Lyall v. Lyall, 250 Ala. 635, 35 So.2d 550; Employers' Ins. Co. v. Brooks, 250 Ala. 36......
-
Grand Bay Land Co. v. Simpson
...decree, is allowable in aid of its execution. McCalley v. Finney, 198 Ala. 462, Gainer v. Jones, 176 Ala. 408, 58 So. 288; Thompson v. Maddux, 105 Ala. 326, 16 So. 885. Appellant further insists that only on the reference appear the balance of account, and that from time to time complainant......
-
Cooper v. Owen, 2 Div. 57
...held liable. But that is not a condemnation of such property. The mere "opinion" of the court is not an effective order. Thompson v. Maddux, 105 Ala. 326, 16 So. 885; Hill v. Hill, 211 Ala. 293, 100 So. 340, and cited. The suit was begun by attachment for $540 on an affidavit alleging that ......
-
Lyall v. Lyall
...relief to complainant or dismissing the suit. Such expression of opinion is not a decree, and will not support an appeal. Thompson v. Maddux, 105 Ala. 326, 16 So. 885; Randall v. Hardy, 107 Ala. 476, 19 So. 971; v. Hill, 211 Ala. 293, 100 So. 340, and other cases there cited. The only effec......