Thompson v. Monticello, Arkansas, 070618 FED8, 16-4080

Docket Nº:16-4080
Opinion Judge:KELLY, CIRCUIT JUDGE.
Party Name:Sheldon Thompson Plaintiff- Appellee v. Monticello, Arkansas, City of, A Public Body Corporate and Politic; Robert Rosegrant, In his Official Capacity as Chief of Police Defendants Ray Singleton, In his Individual and Official Capacity as Police Officer for the City of Monticello AR Defendant-Appellant Eddie Deaton, In his Official Capacity as ...
Judge Panel:Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
Case Date:July 06, 2018
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Sheldon Thompson Plaintiff- Appellee

v.

Monticello, Arkansas, City of, A Public Body Corporate and Politic; Robert Rosegrant, In his Official Capacity as Chief of Police Defendants

Ray Singleton, In his Individual and Official Capacity as Police Officer for the City of Monticello AR Defendant-Appellant

Eddie Deaton, In his Official Capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Monticello, Arkansas Defendant

No. 16-4080

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

July 6, 2018

          Submitted: January 11, 2018

          Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff

          Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

          KELLY, CIRCUIT JUDGE.

         Former City of Monticello, Arkansas, police officer Ray Singleton appeals after the district court1 denied his request for qualified immunity at summary judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging he used excessive force against Sheldon Thompson.

         I. Background

         The following facts are undisputed. In the early morning hours of December 12, 2010, Thompson was walking to his home in Monticello, Arkansas. He was drunk, but he was accompanied by another adult male, Carl Tyson, Jr., as well as his teenaged nephew, Tajah Hicks. Singleton saw Thompson, Tyson, and Hicks from his police cruiser, and ordered them to stop. Tyson and Hicks stopped, but Thompson continued walking. Singleton exited his cruiser and walked in front of Thompson, taking a semi-circular route so as to position Thompson between himself and his cruiser. He drew his taser on Thompson, who then stopped walking. After pulling his taser, Singleton twice ordered Thompson to walk back to the cruiser. At first, he did not comply, and simply stood still. Then, Singleton ordered, "let me see your hands." After Thompson showed his hands, Singleton again directed him to walk back to his cruiser. Thompson dropped his arms to his sides, placed his hands behind his back but underneath his coat, turned around, and started walking toward the cruiser. After taking approximately five steps, he turned back around to face Singleton, raised his left arm to point toward a nearby residence, and said, "You know what? That's my house right over there." At that point, Singleton tased Thompson, who fell to the ground. Thompson's head struck the pavement, rendering him unconscious. When another officer arrived on the scene shortly thereafter, Singleton said, "He [was] refusing to go back and do what I told him to do[. T]ased him and I think he hit his head when he fell."

         Singleton's taser recorded these events from the moment it was unholstered, and the parties offer divergent descriptions of what that video depicts. In Singleton's view, the video shows that Thompson failed to fully comply with his order that he show his hands, was being belligerent, demonstrated resistance, and turned around in an "aggressive manner," causing Singleton to justifiably fear for the safety of both men. According to Thompson, the video shows that he fully complied with Singleton's order that he show his hands, started to walk back to the cruiser in accordance with Singleton's order that he do so, and innocently turned around to tell Singleton he lived nearby and to point at his house. Thompson does not remember the incident, but denies being aggressive. He admits he was intoxicated and being disagreeable.

         Recognizing its obligation to take the taser video and all other facts in the light most favorable to Thompson, the district court summarized the facts as follows: Officer Singleton initiated a stop of three men who were walking on the side of...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP