Thompson v. State

Docket NumberCR-18-425
Decision Date31 October 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
8 cases
  • McCullon v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 14 Diciembre 2023
    ...on a prior occasion; and (6) the lapse of time between the alleged act and the pretrial identification procedure. Thompson v. State, 2019 Ark. 312, at 6, 586 S.W.3d 615, 621. We have explained that "[t]he conclusion to be drawn from these factors is dependent on the totality of the circumst......
  • Wilson v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 22 Septiembre 2022
    ...need not be addressed if it is determined that the pretrial identification procedure is not unduly suggestive. Thompson v. State , 2019 Ark. 312, 586 S.W.3d 615 (citing King v. State , 323 Ark. 558, 916 S.W.2d 725 (1996) ). In this instance, the circuit court did not clearly err in determin......
  • Gray v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • 27 Octubre 2021
    ...to the United States Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right to the effective assistance of counsel. Thompson v. State , 2019 Ark. 312, 586 S.W.3d 615. The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness is "whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of ......
  • Reynolds v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 30 Abril 2020
    ...must demonstrate that the issue would have merited appellate relief and resulted in a finding of reversible error. Thompson v. State , 2019 Ark. 312, 586 S.W.3d 615. Finally, the fact that there was a witness that could have offered testimony beneficial to the defense is not in itself proof......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT