Thompson v. Unterberger, 90-02563
| Citation | 577 So.2d 684,16 Fla. L. Weekly 941 |
| Decision Date | 05 April 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-02563,90-02563 |
| Parties | 16 Fla. L. Weekly 941 Isaac F. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. Simpson UNTERBERGER, Appellee. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Isaac F. Thompson, pro se.
Simson Unterberger, pro se.
Isaac Thompson appeals the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. We reverse.
The petition is directed to the attorney who represented Thompson in his appeal from a 1982 sentence of death, and who was appointed by the court for that purpose. The appeal was successful in that the sentence was commuted to life in prison, but Thompson's conviction for first degree murder was affirmed. Thompson v. State, 456 So.2d 444 (Fla.1984). Thompson now seeks to compel counsel to provide him "with a true and correct copy of the case records ... including but not limited to the transcripts of petitioner's trial." Counsel has agreed to furnish the transcripts in his possession only if provided in advance with the cost of photocopying and postage. Counsel maintains that he possesses "no papers or documents furnished by [Thompson]" apart from the trial transcripts.
The claim asserted in the petition is quite similar to Bermed v. Tacher, 565 So.2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), in which the district court directed appointed counsel to furnish the petitioner with materials prepared in the course of representation. Transcripts provided at public expense to facilitate an indigent defendant's appeal do not become the property of counsel once the appeal has been completed. We therefore see no reason why Thompson should be required to pay the cost of photocopying, in lieu of receiving the original transcript now in counsel's possession.
After remand, unless counsel can advance some compelling justification for imposing this expense upon Thompson, the trial court should grant the petition for mandamus if such action remains necessary to insure that Thompson receives his trial transcripts. On the other hand, we do not believe that counsel's insistence upon being reimbursed for postage is unreasonable, and the trial court should not require counsel to shoulder this burden. Furthermore, unless Thompson can identify with specificity the other he requires, and can demonstrate that they are his personal property and not counsel's work product, counsel should not be required to surrender or reproduce the contents of his file without adequate compensation.
Reversed.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Smith v. State, s. 96-00365
...So.2d 1 (Fla.1993); Yanke v. State, 588 So.2d 4 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), rev. denied, 595 So.2d 559 (Fla.1992). See also Thompson v. Unterberger, 577 So.2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (transcripts paid for at public expense are available to an indigent prisoner at no Mandamus is a common law remedy u......
-
Harrell v. State
...(Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (quoting Pearce v. Sheffey, 647 So.2d 333, 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)). In his motion, Harrell cited Thompson v. Unterberger, 577 So.2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), and argued that because he is indigent he is entitled to any transcripts or depositions that were prepared at public......
-
Donahue v. Vaughn, 98-1750.
...1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). Petitioner is not seeking transcripts which have been paid for at public expense, as in Thompson v. Unterberger, 577 So.2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) and Dubose v. Shelnutt, 566 So.2d 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Although the Public Defender's Office is an agency which mai......
-
Potts v. State, 2D03-2536.
...public expense on behalf of an indigent defendant must be provided to the defendant without charge for copying. Thompson v. Unterberger, 577 So.2d 684, 685-86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Colon v. Irwin, 732 So.2d 428, 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Similarly, a defendant is entitled to the return of pers......