Thornton v. State
| Decision Date | 12 February 1904 |
| Citation | Thornton v. State, 119 Ga. 437, 46 S.E. 640 (Ga. 1904) |
| Parties | THORNTON . v. STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
CRIMINAL, LAW—PRINCIPAL IN SECOND DEGREE.
1.To constitute one a principal in the second degree, he must not only be present when the crime is committed, but must aid and abet the actual perpetrator of the crime.One who is present when a crime is committed, hut neither assists in its commission, nor shares in the crim-inal intent of its perpetrator, is not guilty as a principal in the second degree.
¶1.SeeCriminal Law, vol. 14, CentDig. § 86.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from Superior Court, Chattahoochee County; W. B. Butt, Judge.
Wilborn Thornton was convicted of murder, and brings error.Reversed.
J. B. Hudson, C. C. Minter, Graham Forrester, and Hatcher & Carson, for plaintiff in error.
S. P. Gilbert, Sol.Gen., and Jno.C. Hart, Atty. Gen., for the State.
FISH, P. J. Dan Amos and Wilborn Thornton were indicted for the murder of Sam Gordon.In one count they were both charged as principals, and in another count Thornton was charged as principal in the second degree.Upon the trial of Thornton, it appeared that Amos, Thornton, Gordon, and others attended a dance at the house of one Wilson, in Chattahoochee county, and that, some time between 10 and 1 o'clock of the night of the dance, Thornton loaned Amos a pistol.Ben Gordon, a witness for the state, testified: It appeared that Dan Amos shot Sam Gordon next morning about 7 o'clock, in an old field, about 100 yards from Wilson's house.Ben Gordon further testified: Arthur Denson, a witness for the state, testified: Thornton was found guilty, and sentenced to the penitentiary for life.He moved for a new trial upon various grounds, one of which was that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and without evidence to support it.A new trial was refused, and he excepted.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Scott v. State
...before and after the offense are circumstances from which one's participation in the criminal intent may be inferred." Thornton v. State, 119 Ga. 437, 439, 46 S.E. 640 (1903 [1904]). Accord, Jones v. State, 242 Ga. 893, 252 S.E.2d 394 (1979); Kimbro v. State, 152 Ga.App. 893, 264 S.E.2d 327......
-
Jones v. State
...one of her companions as they separated the next morning that she knew "we would all probably go to jail." Citing Thornton v. State, 119 Ga. 437, 46 S.E. 640 (1903), defendant urges that mere presence at the scene of the commission of a crime is not sufficient to convict a witness of being ......
-
Slack v. State
...and after the offense are circumstances from which one's participation in the criminal intent may be inferred." Thornton v. State, 119 Ga. 437, 439, 46 S.E. 640 (1903). Accord Jones v. State, 242 Ga. 893, 252 S.E.2d 394 (1979); Kimbro v. State, 152 Ga.App. 893, 264 S.E.2d 327 (1980). The st......
-
Searcy v. State
...either before or after the offense are circumstances from which one's participation in the crime may be inferred. Thornton v. State, 119 Ga. 437, 439, 46 S.E. 640; Jones v. State, 242 Ga. 893, 252 S.E.2d 394 supra; Kimbro v. State, 152 Ga.App. 893, 264 S.E.2d 327; Slack v. State, 159 Ga.App......