Three Keys, Ltd. v. Kennedy Funding, Inc.

Decision Date20 November 2009
Docket NumberNo. 5D08-802.,No. 5D08-3884.,5D08-802.,5D08-3884.
Citation28 So.3d 894
PartiesTHREE KEYS, LTD. and Brad Muller, as Successor Trustee of the Corinne R. Muller Trust, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. KENNEDY FUNDING, INC., Kennedy Funding, LLC, and Anglo-American Financial, LLP, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • DuBrul v. Citrosuco N. Am., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • September 4, 2012
    ...judgment on breach of contract claim after interpreting contractual provisions to provide a right to relief); Three Keys, Ltd. v. Kennedy Funding, Inc., 28 So.3d 894 (Fla.App.2009) (finding that trial court properly directed a verdict for appellees on appellant's breach of contract claim); ......
  • Sch. Bd. of Palm Beach Cnty. v. Groover
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 13, 2022
    ...In general, a trial court's denial of equitable relief is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Three Keys, Ltd. v. Kennedy Funding, Inc. , 28 So. 3d 894, 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). The determination of whether reinstatement is an appropriate remedy is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Gold......
  • First Equitable Realty III, Ltd. v. Grandview Palace Condo. Ass'n, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 6, 2021
    ...ensued.STANDARD OF REVIEW"[A] declaratory judgment is accorded a presumption of correctness." Three Keys, Ltd. v. Kennedy Funding, Inc., 28 So. 3d 894, 903 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). Here, however, because "the trial court's interpretation and application of" the Declaration and other condominium......
  • Packaging v. Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • September 17, 2010
    ...to all provisions of a contract is preferred to one that renders part of the contract meaningless." Three Keys, Ltd. v. Kennedy Funding, Inc. (Fla.App. 2009), 28 So.3d 894, 903-904. Thus, apparently inconsistent contractual provisions "must be given such an interpretation and construction a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT