Thrivent Fin. for Lutherans v. State, 1D13–5299.

CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)
Citation145 So.3d 178
Docket NumberNo. 1D13–5299.,1D13–5299.
PartiesTHRIVENT FINANCIAL FOR LUTHERANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Appellee.
Decision Date05 August 2014

145 So.3d 178

THRIVENT FINANCIAL FOR LUTHERANS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Appellee.

No. 1D13–5299.

District Court of Appeal of Florida,
First District.

Aug. 5, 2014.


[145 So.3d 179]


Timothy G. Schoenwalder of Blank & Meenan, P.A., Tallahassee, and Andrew B. Kay of Cozen O'Connor, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Wendy L. Furman of Pett Furman, PL, Boca Raton, and Jason P. Gosselin and Laura M. Zulick of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLT, Philadelphia, PA, for American Council of Life Insurers, Amicus Curiae in support of Thrivent Financial for Lutherans.


Richard T. Donelan, Jr., Chief Counsel, and Paul C. Stadler, Jr., Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Steve Burgess, Insurance Consumer Advocate and Michael Kliner, Senior Attorney, Office of the Insurance Consumer Advocate, Florida Department of Financial Services, Amicus Curiae in support of Florida Department of Financial Services.

WOLF, J.

Appellant, Thrivent Financial for Lutherans (Thrivent), appeals from a declaratory statement issued by the Department of Financial Services (DFS) interpreting section 717.107, Florida Statutes (2013). We find DFS' interpretation of section 717.107 is clearly erroneous because it ignores the plain language of the statute. Accordingly, we reverse.

[145 So.3d 180]

I. Relevant Statutes

Section 717.107, which is part of the Florida Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act, requires insurers to remit to DFS any life insurance funds that remain “unclaimed” for a certain period of time—referred to as the “dormancy period”—after the funds become “due and payable.” DFS may impose penalties and charge interest on funds that are not reported and paid to DFS as required by chapter 717. See § 717.134, Fla. Stat. Section 717.107 states in relevant part:

(1) Funds held or owing under any life or endowment insurance policy or annuity contract which has matured or terminated are presumed unclaimed if unclaimed for more than 5 years after the funds became due and payable as established from the records of the insurance company holding or owing the funds, but property described in paragraph (3)(b) is presumed unclaimed if such property is not claimed for more than 2 years. The amount presumed unclaimed shall include any amount due and payable under s. 627.4615.

...

(3) For purposes of this chapter, a life or endowment insurance policy or annuity contract not matured by actual proof of the death of the insured or annuitant according to the records of the company is deemed matured and the proceeds due and payable if:

(a) The company knows that the insured or annuitant has died; or

(b)1. The insured has attained, or would have attained if he or she were living, the limiting age under the mortality table on which the reserve is based;

2. The policy was in force at the time the insured attained, or would have attained, the limiting age specified in subparagraph 1.; and

3. Neither the insured nor any other person appearing to have an interest in the policy within the preceding 2 years, according to the records of the company, has assigned, readjusted, or paid premiums on the policy; subjected the policy to a loan; corresponded in writing with the company concerning the policy; or otherwise indicated an interest as evidenced by a memorandum or other record on file prepared by an employee of the company.

...

(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the company learns of the death of the insured or annuitant and the beneficiary has not communicated with the insurer within 4 months after the death, the company shall take reasonable steps to pay the proceeds to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State ex rel. Perdue v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • June 16, 2015
    ...Circuit Court of Florida on that point was confirmed last year in Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. Department of Financial Services, 145 So.3d 178 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2014). In Thrivent, the court of appeals reversed the declaration of the DFS that the state's Disposition of Unclaimed Prope......
  • Patronis v. United Ins. Co. of Am., No. 1D18-2114
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • June 3, 2020
    ...was ultimately invalidated in substantial part in Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. State, Department of Financial Services , 145 So. 3d 178, 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), which held that the Department's declaratory statement as to when proceeds are due and payable was erroneous. Under the th......
  • State v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co., 14-0100
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • June 16, 2015
    ...Circuit Court of Florida on that point was confirmed last year in Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. Department of Financial Services, 145 So. 3d 178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014). In Thrivent, the court of appeals reversed the declaration of the DFS that the state's Disposition of Unclaimed ......
  • Soc'y for Clinical & Med. Hair Removal, Inc. v. Dep't of Health
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • December 31, 2015
    ...statement only if the agency's interpretation of the law is clearly erroneous." Thrivent Fin. for Lutherans v. Dep't of Fin. Servs., 145 So.3d 178, 181 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). An agency's interpretation of an ambiguous statute or rule that it administers is not clearly erroneous if it " ‘is wi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT