Tibbels v. Colorado
| Docket Number | 20SC22 |
| Decision Date | 10 January 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
People v. Sanders
...the use of a puzzle analogy can be problematic, especially if the speaker quantifies the concept of reasonable doubt); see also Tibbels v. People , 2022 CO 1, ¶ 49, 501 P.3d 792 (concluding that a judge's use of a crack-in-the-foundation illustration to explain reasonable doubt improperly l......
-
People v. Vialpando
...the burden of proof by making it seem easy to ascertain. We recognize that analogies like these are perilous and unhelpful. See Tibbels v. People , 2022 CO 1, ¶ 25, 501 P.3d 792, 797. Nevertheless, the trial court instructed the jury multiple times that they must follow only the instruction......
-
Pettigrew v. People
...statements to the prospective jurors by addressing our standard of review. We then address the applicable law, discussed more fully in Tibbels, ¶¶ 23-43, which we also today, and we apply those principles to the facts before us. 1. Standard of Review ¶31 We review de novo the question of wh......
-
Benally v. People
...Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Colorado Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Tibbels v. People, 20SC22, 2022 CO 1. 1 ...