Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Prods., Inc.
| Decision Date | 23 May 1933 |
| Citation | 262 N.Y. 482,188 N.E. 30 |
| Parties | TIFFANY & COMPANY, Respondent, v. TIFFANY PRODUCTIONS, Inc., Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department (237 App. Div. 801, 260 N. Y. S. 821), entered December 12, 1932, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term enjoining and restraining the defendant, its officers, agents, and employees from using the name ‘Tiffany’ or any similar name or names as part of the defendant's corporate name, or as a label, designation or mark, or otherwise in connection with defendant's business in any manner whatsoever. The plaintiff is a domestic corporation organized in 1868, engaged in the manufacture and sale of jewelry, silverware, stationery, leather goods, etc., and having retail stores in New York City, London, and Paris. The defendant is a domestic corporation organized in 1921, and engaged in the production and distribution of motion pictures.
Charles H. Kelby, H. William Fitelson, and I. Jack London, all of New York City, for appellant.
R. L. von Bernuth, M. S. Lockhart, J. M. Rose, and H. J. Sillcocks, all of New York City, for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
HUBBS, J., not sitting.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mead Data Cent., Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
...Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc., 147 Misc. 679, 264 N.Y.S. 459 (1932), aff'd, 237 A.D. 801, 260 N.Y.S. 821, aff'd, 262 N.Y. 482, 188 N.E. 30 (1933); Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. Mindlin, 163 Misc. 52, 296 N.Y.S. 176 (1937). 1954 N.Y.Legis.Ann. It is apparent from these ref......
-
Bagby v. Blackwell, 20964.
... ... Hutchinson v. McGrath, 92 Mo. 355, 5 S.W. 29; Mary Muffet, Inc., v. Smelansky, 158 S.W. 2d 168, 170; American Steel Foundries v ... A. & P. Cleaners and Dyers, Inc., 10 F. Supp. 450; Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc., 264 N.Y.S. 459, 188 N.E. 30; Horlick's ... ...
-
Bagby v. Blackwell
... ... Hutchinson v. McGrath, 92 Mo. 355, 5 S.W. 29; Mary ... Muffet, Inc., v. Smelansky, 158 S.W. 2d 168, 170; ... American Steel Foundries v ... A. & P ... Cleaners and Dyers, Inc., 10 F.Supp. 450; Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc., 264 N.Y.S. 459, 188 ... N.E. 30; ... ...
-
Ivy League Sch., Inc. v. Danick Indus., Inc.
...Inc ., 147 Misc. 679, 264 NYS 459 [Sup Ct, N.Y. County 1932], aff'd. 237 App.Div. 801, 260 NYS 821 [1st Dept 1932], aff'd. 262 N.Y. 482, 188 NE 30 [1933] ).Here, the plaintiffs' Fourth cause of action and their Seventh cause of action sound in “common law unfair competition” and “common law......
-
The trademark dilution revision act of 2006: prospective changes to dilution definition, claim analyses, and standard of harm.
...from the particular product in connection with which it has been used."'), aff'd, 260 N.Y.S. 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932), aff'd, 262 N.Y. 482,188 N.E. 30 (65.) Tiffany & Co., 264 N.Y.S. at 460-61. (66.) Id. at 463. (67.) Id. (68.) Bulova Watch Co. v. Stolzberg, 69 F. Supp. 543, 545 (D. Ma......