Tiller v. Yw Housing Partners, Ltd.
Decision Date | 03 October 2008 |
Docket Number | 2070417. |
Citation | 5 So.3d 623 |
Parties | Dagmar TILLER v. YW HOUSING PARTNERS, LTD. |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
Kenneth J. Lay and Stephanie C. Blackburn of Legal Services Alabama, Inc., Birmingham, for appellant.
Greggory M. Deitsch and R. Ryan Daugherty of Sirote & Permutt, P.C., Birmingham, for appellee.
Dagmar Tiller appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Jefferson Circuit Court in favor of YW Housing Partners, Ltd. ("YW Housing").
On April 5, 2007, YW Housing filed a complaint against Tiller in the Jefferson District Court alleging a claim of unlawful detainer. Tiller answered the complaint, asserting, among other things, the affirmative defense of retaliatory eviction; Tiller also filed a counterclaim asserting retaliatory eviction. On April 30, 2007, YW Housing filed an answer to the counterclaim. On June 25, 2007, the district court entered a judgment in favor of YW Housing on the complaint and the counterclaim. On June 21, 2007, Tiller filed a motion to alter, amend, or vacate the judgment or, in the alternative, for a new trial.1 On June 28, 2007, the district court noted that the parties had consented to extend the time for ruling on Tiller's postjudgment motion, pursuant to Rule 59.1, Ala. R. Civ. P. On July 10, 2007, the district court denied Tiller's postjudgment motion. On July 17, 2007, Tiller filed her notice of appeal to the Jefferson Circuit Court.
On August 16, 2007, YW Housing filed a motion for a summary judgment. That same day, YW Housing filed a motion to issue a writ of possession, alleging that Tiller had failed to pay money into the court pending the appeal of this case, as required by Ala.Code 1975, § 6-6-351. Tiller filed a response to the summary-judgment motion on August 28, 2007. On August 29, 2007, Tiller filed a motion for a reduction of bond, a motion for a stay, and a response to YW Housing's motion for a writ of possession.
On September 7, 2007, the circuit court entered a judgment stating, in pertinent part:
On September 25, 2007, YW Housing moved the court to amend the judgment to waive the automatic stay provided under Rule 62(a), Ala. R. Civ. P. The circuit court granted that motion on September 25, 2007. On September 26, 2007, the circuit court issued a writ of execution.
On October 4, 2007, Tiller filed a motion to alter, amend, or vacate the circuit court's judgment or, in the alternative, for a new trial. YW Housing filed a response in opposition to that motion on October 23, 2007. The trial court denied Tiller's postjudgment motion on December 3, 2007.
On January 7, 2008, Tiller filed her notice of appeal with the Alabama Supreme Court; that court transferred the appeal to this court because it is within the original appellate jurisdiction of this court.
YW Housing submitted an affidavit of Bernetta Cox, the director of housing of YW Housing. She attested that Tiller and YW Housing had entered into a lease agreement ("the lease") for certain premises ("the premises"). The lease was executed on February 4, 2005, and provided, in pertinent part:
An addendum to the lease, which was also executed on February 4, 2005, provided, in pertinent part:
Cox attested that Tiller had failed to pay rent and other charges beginning in March 2007. Therefore, YW Housing served Tiller with a seven-day notice dated March 16, 2007, that stated, in pertinent part:
(Emphasis omitted.) Cox further attested that Tiller had failed to vacate the premises and that she owed YW Housing $1,650 in unpaid rent and other charges.
Tiller attested in her affidavit that she had been current on her rent through the end of February 2007. Tiller attested that, at that time, she had "mentioned to the management of the premises that [she] might be moving, at which time the management deleted [her] from the computer system in which the rent is logged." She attested that when she...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rose, LLC v. Treasure Island, LLC
...by agreement of the parties," Boyd v. Boone Mgmt., Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24, 26-27 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984). See Tiller v. YW Hous. Partners, Ltd., 5 So. 3d 623, 629 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008) ; Berry v. Crawford, 237 Ark. 380, 373 S.W.2d 129, 131 (1963) ; Boston LLC v. Juarez, 245 Cal.App.4th 75, 199 Cal......
-
Hooks v. Pettaway
...burden to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence of a nonmovant's claim by simply ignoring the claim.’ ” Tiller v. YW Hous. Partners, Ltd., 5 So.3d 623, 630 (Ala.Civ.App.2008) (quoting White Sands Group, L.L.C. v. PRS II, LLC, 998 So.2d at 1055). For these reasons, we affirm the judgment......
-
Breland v. Levada Ef Five, LLC
...failure to pay taxes on the Utah property, Plaintiffs cannot benefit from Levada's nonperformance. See Tiller v. YW Housing Partners, Ltd., 5 So. 3d 623, 629 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008).3 Testimony at trial diverges on this point. On the one hand you have Mr. Breland testifying that he told Adria......
-
Adler v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon
...Questions of law are reviewed de novo. Alabama Republican Party v. McGinley, 893 So.2d 337, 342 (Ala.2004)." Tiller v. YW Hous. Partners, Ltd., 5 So.3d 623, 628 (Ala.Civ.App.2008). Adler's argument is premised on the conclusion that the 2012 foreclosure deed is valid because it was never sp......