TIMETRUST v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 9729.
| Decision Date | 17 March 1941 |
| Docket Number | No. 9729.,9729. |
| Citation | 118 F.2d 718 |
| Parties | TIMETRUST, Incorporated, et al. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Bacigalupi, Elkus & Salinger and Claude Rosenberg, all of San Francisco, Cal., and Gumpert & Mazzera, and Harry Mazzera, all of Stockton, Cal., for appellants Timetrust, Inc., and others.
Keyes & Erskine, Herbert W. Erskine, and Louis Ferrari, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants Bank of America and others.
Dreher, McClellan & McCarthy, J. Ed McClellan, and John L. McNab, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant John Grant.
Chester T. Lane, Gen. Counsel, and Christopher M. Jenks, both of Washington, D. C., Howard A. Judy, of San Francisco, Cal., J. Leonard Townsend, of Washington, D. C., E. Forrest Tancer, of San Francisco, Cal., Douglas M. Orr and Thomas A. Schwartz, both of Washington, D. C., for Securities and Exchange Commission.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
On stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing ordered motion of appellee to dismiss appeal herein withdrawn.
Further ordered, on stipulation, that the appeal herein be, and hereby is dismissed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate of this court issued forthwith.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Brennan v. Midwestern United Life Insurance Company, Civ. No. 1716.
...and abettors could be enjoined under Section 10(b). That decision was appealed, but the appeal was dismissed on stipulation. 118 F.2d 718 (9th Cir. 1941). The district court then heard evidence and enjoined all the defendants. The granting of the injunctions against the aiders and abettors ......
-
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Barraco
...& Co., Inc., 186 F. Supp. 19 (S.D.N.Y.1960); S.E.C. v. Timetrust Inc., 28 F.Supp. 34 (N.D.Cal. 1939), appeal dism'd by stipulation, 118 F.2d 718 (9 Cir. 1941). See also Brennan v. Midwestern United Life Ins. Co., 259 F.Supp, 673, 680-681 (N.D.Ind. We have gone through the Act, in deference ......
-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COM'N v. Scott Taylor & Co.
...of Burley & Co., 23 SEC 461 (1946); SEC v. Timetrust, Inc., D.C.N.D.Cal.1939, 28 F. Supp. 34, appeal dismissed on stipulation, 9 Cir., 1941, 118 F.2d 718; Loss, supra, at 846, n. ...