Tirado v. Lubarsky
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Term |
| Writing for the Court | Before STREIT; PER CURIAM |
| Citation | Tirado v. Lubarsky, 276 N.Y.S.2d 128, 52 Misc.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Term 1966) |
| Decision Date | 20 October 1966 |
| Parties | Rafael TIRADO, Appellant, v. Gerald LUBARSKY, Leo S. Lubarsky and Gertrude Lubarsky, Respondents. |
Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County; Martin Kraus, Judge, 49 Misc.2d 543, 268 N.Y.S.2d 54.
Before STREIT, J.P., and GOLD and HOFSTADTER, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs. No opinion.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
9 cases
-
Beneficial Commercial Corp. v. Murray Glick Datsun, Inc.
... ... Although Nissan agreed to repurchase vehicles if Glick defaulted, it can not be held responsible for the alleged intervening conversion. See Tirado v. Lubarsky, 49 Misc.2d 543, 544, 268 N.Y.S.2d 54, 56 (N.Y.Civ.Ct.), aff'd, 52 Misc.2d 527, 276 N.Y.S.2d 128 (N.Y.App. Term 1966). The Court rejects ... ...
-
Sherman v. Concourse Realty Corp.
...322 N.Y.S.2d 207; Hall v. Fraknoi, 69 Misc.2d 470, 330 N.Y.S.2d 637; Tirado v. Lubarsky, 49 Misc.2d 543, 268 N.Y.S.2d 54, affd. 52 Misc.2d 527, 276 N.Y.S.2d 1281. A review of the cases is helpful to a consideration of the problem In Horney v. World Is. Estates (supra), the plaintiff tenants......
-
Cullen v. BMW of North America, Inc.
... ... of Claims 1975); Smith v. ABC Realty Co., 71 Misc.2d 384, 336 N.Y.S.2d 104 (App. Term 1st Dept. 1972); Tirado v. Lubarsky, 49 Misc.2d 543, 268 N.Y.S.2d 54 (Civ.Ct.Bronx Cty.), aff'd, 52 Misc.2d 527, 276 N.Y.S.2d 128 (App. Term 1st Dept. 1966); cf. Sherman v ... ...
-
Ward v. State
... ... 800, 47 N.E.2d 50; Rucker v. Andress, 38 A.D.2d 684, 327 N.Y.S.2d 91, 848; Vincent v. Dickinson, 36 A.D.2d 570, 317 N.Y.S.2d 682 and Tirado v. Lubarsky, 49 Misc.2d 543, 268 N.Y.S.2d 54, aff'd, 52 Misc.2d 527, 276 N.Y.S.2d 128 ... Not every possible accident due to unusual ... ...
Get Started for Free
