Tirko v. State

Decision Date01 March 1962
Docket NumberNo. 61-378,61-378
CitationTirko v. State, 138 So.2d 388 (Fla. App. 1962)
PartiesSamuel Francis TIRKO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Charles A. Gould, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Herbert P. Benn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HORTON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was informed against for breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny (§ 810.02, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.) and grand larceny (§ 811.021).On trial without a jury he was found guilty.Judgment and sentence followed, and he appealed.His two contentions have been considered and found to be without merit.The finger print evidence sufficiently met the requirement that where it is relied on to establish identity, the circumstances must be such that the print could have been made only at the time the crime was committed.SeeAnnot.28 A.L.R.2d 1115, 1150-1155;3 Wharton's Criminal Evidence, § 982(12th ed. 1955).The court could have so found on the evidence presented.Undisputed evidence that the amount of money taken was $170 met the need to show a taking of more than $100 under the information.1Lang v. State, 42 Fla. 595, 28 So. 856;32 Am.Jur., Larceny, § 139.

Affirmed.

On Petition for Rehearing.

The petition calls attention to the reference in our opinion to the trial as having taken place before a jury, whereas the defendant was tried before the court without a jury.The opinion has been corrected accordingly.The petition for rehearing is denied.

1The information charging grand larceny included the following: '* * * did then and there unlawfully and feloniously take, steal, and carry away the money, goods and chattels of John H. Long, doing business as Long's B. S. A. Motor Sales, to-wit: Cash in the sum of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
32 cases
  • Sorey v. State, 81-2465
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 28, 1982
    ...that "the circumstances must be such that the print could have been made only at the time the crime was committed." 2 Tirko v. State, 138 So.2d 388, 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). The determination of whether the circumstances are such that the print could have been made only at the time the crime......
  • Engdall v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 26, 1975
    ...at the time the crime was Committed. Bryant v. State, Fla.1970, 235 So.2d 721; Ivey v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 611; Tirko v. State, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 388; see also Williams v. State, Fla.App.1975, 308 So.2d 595; A.V.P. v. State, Fla.App.1975, 307 So.2d 468. The testimony in the......
  • Wilcox v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 21, 1978
    ...in conformity with the law relating thereto as pronounced in Ivey v. State, 176 So.2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965), and Tirko v. State, 138 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962), in which it was held that where fingerprint evidence is relied on to establish that the defendant is the perpetrator of a crime......
  • Williams v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • May 5, 1971
    ...(Fla.1970); Wilkerson v. State, 232 So.2d 217 (2nd D.C.A.Fla.1970); Ivey v. State, 176 So.2d 611 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1965); Tirko v. State, 138 So.2d 388 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1962). Pubic hair taken from the victim's bed had microscopic characteristics identical to appellant's pubic hair, but this is ......
  • Get Started for Free