Tirrill v. McNamara, 71-1024.

Decision Date03 December 1971
Docket NumberNo. 71-1024.,71-1024.
Citation451 F.2d 579
PartiesJack D. TIRRILL, Appellant, v. Joseph J. McNAMARA, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

John L. Svoboda, Springfield, Or., for appellant.

Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., Morton Hollander, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Michael L. Morehouse, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY, ELY, and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The District Court dismissed Tirrill's complaint, seeking recovery for alleged medical malpractice, and this appeal followed. We affirm.

Our court has consistently held that an army physician is immunized from tort liability to a fellow soldier when the alleged act of malpractice occurred in a military hospital and was committed by the physician in the line of his military duty. E. g., Bailey v. Van Buskirk, 345 F.2d 298 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 948, 86 S.Ct. 1205, 16 L.Ed.2d 210 (1966). See also Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L. Ed. 152 (1950); Mattos v. United States, 412 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1969); Bailey v. DeQuevedo, 375 F.2d 72 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923, 88 S. Ct. 247, 19 L.Ed.2d 274 (1967).

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • December 29, 1980
    ...from third party claims that would be barred by Feres if directly asserted against the government as "Feres/Stencel". 10 Tirrill v. MacNamara, 451 F.2d 579 (CA9 1971); Bailey v. DeQuevedo, 375 F.2d 72 (CA3 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923, 88 S.Ct. 247, 19 L.Ed.2d 274 (1967); Misko v. Unit......
  • Alvarez v. Wilson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • March 7, 1977
    ...scope of their duties, especially in negligence actions. Hass v. United States, 518 F.2d 1138, 1143 (4th Cir. 1975); Tirrill v. McNamara, 451 F.2d 579 (9th Cir. 1971); contra, Henderson v. Bluemink, 167 U.S. App.D.C. 161, 511 F.2d 399 (1974). In Birdwell v. Schlesinger, 403 F.Supp. 710 (Col......
  • Jaffee v. U.S., 79-1543
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • November 2, 1981
    ...e. g., Uptegrove v. United States, 600 F.2d 1248 (9th Cir. 1979); Hass v. United States, 518 F.2d 1138 (4th Cir. 1975); Tirrill v. McNamara, 451 F.2d 579 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Lee, 400 F.2d 558 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053, 89 S.Ct. 691, 21 L.Ed.2d 695 The second......
  • Trerice v. Pedersen
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • January 11, 1985
    ...Buskirk, 345 F.2d 298, 298 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 948, 86 S.Ct. 1205, 16 L.Ed.2d 210 (1966); see also Tirrill v. McNamara, 451 F.2d 579, 579 (9th Cir.1971). These decisions constitute extensions of the doctrine of Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT