Tivoli Realty v. Paramount Pictures, 10191-10194.
| Decision Date | 06 December 1950 |
| Docket Number | No. 10191-10194.,10191-10194. |
| Citation | 186 F.2d 120 |
| Parties | TIVOLI REALTY, Inc. v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al., Interstate Circuit, Inc., and Texas Consolidated Theatres, Inc., appellants. TIVOLI REALTY, Inc. v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Paramount Pictures, Inc.; Paramount Film Distributing Corp.; Loew's Inc.; Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.; RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp.; Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.; Columbia Pictures Corp.; United Artists Corp.; Universal Pictures, Inc., and Universal Film Exchange, Inc., appellants. I. B. ADELMAN v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Interstate Circuit, Inc. and Texas Consolidated Theatres, Inc., appellants. I. B. ADELMAN v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Paramount Pictures, Inc.; Paramount Film Distributing Corp.; Lowe's Inc.; Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.; RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp.; Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.; Columbia Pictures Corp.; United Artists Corp.; Universal Pictures, Inc., and Universal Film Exchange, Inc., appellants. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Robert E. Sher, Washington, D. C., Roy McDonald, New York City (Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Del., Hastings, Stockly, Walz & Wise, Wilmington, Del., Morris Steel, Nichols & Arsht, Wilmington, Del., Southerland, Berl & Potter, Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellants.
Thurman Arnold, Washington, D. C. (Killoran & Van Brunt, Wilmington Del., Arnold, Fortas & Porter, Washington, D. C., Thompson, Meek & Goldberg, Dallas, Tex., on the brief), for appellees.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
The order complained of is not appealable under Section 1291 or Section 1292, Title 28 United States Code Annotated. See the opinion filed concurrently with this in Paramount Pictures, Inc., v. Rodney, 186 F.2d 111, petitions for mandamus.
The appeals will be dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hart v. Community Sch. Bd. of Brooklyn, NY Sch. D.# 21
... ... Restaurant of Feltmans ranked with Copenhagen's Tivoli Gardens as places of family amusement and pleasure ... Inspection of the pictures of the graduating class, as well as the testimony, reveals ... of the Common Law 212-215 (1921); In re Wilton Realty Corp., 30 F.Supp. 486 (E.D.Mich. 1938), aff'd, 106 F.2d ... 122, 2 L.Ed.2d 76 (1957); Tivoli Realty v. Paramount Pictures, 10 F.R.D. 201, 203 (D.Del.), aff'd per curiam, ... ...
- Johnson v. United States, 6098.
-
Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Ginsburg
...holding that an order of transfer made under section 1404(a) is an interlocutory order and not appealable. Tivoli Realty, Inc., v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 3 Cir., 1950, 186 F.2d 120, a per curiam following the decision of the Court in Paramount Pictures, Inc., v. Rodney, supra. See author......