Tkaczyk v. Gallagher
Decision Date | 19 September 1966 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 11551. |
Citation | 259 F. Supp. 584 |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut |
Parties | Sampson TKACZYK et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth GALLAGHER et al., Defendants. |
Loring J. Whiteside, Woodbridge, Conn., for plaintiffs.
Hugh Meade Alcorn, Jr., of Alcorn, Bakewell & Smith, Hartford, Conn., and Albert L. Coles, Bridgeport, Conn., for defendants John Hamilton King, James E. Murphy, Howard W. Alcorn, Charles S. House, and Elmer W. Ryan.
John J. Cotter, of Cotter, Cotter & Sohon, Bridgeport, Conn., for defendant Herman N. Levy.
Albert W. Cretella and Lawrence J. Carboni, New Haven, Conn., for defendants Leo T. Berniere and Walter T. Berniere.
Dennis N. Garvey, of Garvey, Colleran & Weiner, New Haven, Conn., for defendant Herman Levine.
Michael Dorney, of Gumbart, Corbin, Tyler & Cooper, New Haven, Conn., for defendant Dr. Sterling P. Taylor.
Walter A. DeAndrade, Cheshire, Conn., pro se and for defendant Kenneth Gallagher.
William P. Lage, Madison, Conn., for defendant Arthur B. O'Keefe, Jr.
James O. Shea, New Haven, Conn., for defendants Nathan G. Sachs, Herman N. Levy and Paul A. Scholder.
Joseph F. Trotta, New Haven, Conn., for defendant Robert A. Rousseau.
Harold M. Mulvey, Atty. Gen. of Connecticut, Hartford, Conn., for defendants Leo Parskey, James P. Doherty, Edward Horwitz, James J. Corrigan, Arthur T. Gorman, George R. Tiernan, Nathan G. Sachs and Dr. Sterling P. Taylor.
Appeal Dismissed from Bench by Court of Appeals September 19, 1966.
it is therefore
Ordered as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Baskin's Appeal from Probate, In re
...163 (1966), was dismissed for failure to prosecute with due diligence under Practice Book (1963) § 396, now § 3109.In Tkaczyk v. Gallagher, 259 F.Supp. 584 (D.Conn.1966), the plaintiffs attempted to challenge the actions of the state courts in refusing to transfer custody and control of the......
-
Jemzura v. Belden
...by defendants, including their motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Tkaczyk v. Gallagher, 259 F.Supp. 584, 587 (D.Conn.1966), appeal dismissed by Court of Appeals on September 19, 1966, cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1013 (1967); see T. B. Harms Company ......
- United States v. Hecht
-
Tkaczyk v. Gallagher
...over the subject matter, such order having been confirmed by entry of a memorandum order on September 16, 1966 (Tkaczyk v. Gallagher, 259 F.Supp. 584 (D.Conn.1966)); The Court of Appeals having dismissed plaintiffs' appeals from the aforesaid order of this Court; and This Court having recei......