Tobin v. Block
| Decision Date | 26 June 1937 |
| Docket Number | No. 2590.,2590. |
| Citation | 19 F. Supp. 747 |
| Parties | TOBIN v. BLOCK. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Nevada |
N. J. Barry, of Reno, Nev., for plaintiff.
Platt & Sinai, of Reno, Nev., for defendant.
This is an action at law by plaintiff to recover judgment against defendant for a balance due upon a promissory note, executed by defendant to the Reno National Bank as payee. The answer of defendant denies that any sum is due, owing, or unpaid on account of said note. Further answering and by way of affirmative defense, defendant alleges that on December 3, 1932, defendant was the owner and holder of a claim against said bank in a sum in excess of the balance due on said note by reason of a check of said date drawn on said bank by defendant's wife, payable to plaintiff or order; that thereafter, on said date, defendant offered to pay said bank the full amount of its claim against him, by tendering to said bank said check, and made demand that said bank set off the amount of said check against the amount of his indebtedness, which offer and demand was by said bank refused; that subsequent to the appointment of plaintiff as receiver, a similar tender and demand was made to and upon plaintiff, which was refused. Defendant prays judgment that plaintiff take nothing and that defendant have judgment to the extent of any sum remaining due to defendant from said bank after making a set-off of the amount of defendant's said claim against the claim sued upon by plaintiff.
The case was submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, which include the following: That up to about November 1, 1932, the Reno National Bank was doing a general banking business in the city of Reno, Nev.; that on December 12, 1932, the Comptroller of the Currency adjudged said bank to be insolvent and appointed plaintiff receiver thereof; that on May 1, 1931, defendant made, executed, and delivered his promissory note to said bank in the principal sum of $1,000, payable on demand with interest at 8 per cent.; that said note came into plaintiff's hands as a portion of the assets of said bank and at said time there was a balance due thereon in the sum of $550, together with interest from December 31, 1931; that on December 3, 1932, and for some time prior thereto, Mrs. Annie Block, wife of defendant, had on deposit in said bank in a checking account in her name an amount equal to or in excess of $650.81, and on said date she executed and delivered to plaintiff a check in said amount on said bank payable to plaintiff or order, and ever since said date defendant was and now is the owner and holder of a claim against said bank in the amount represented by said check; that, on the date of said check, defendant offered to pay to said bank the full amount of its claim as represented by said note, by tendering to said bank said check demanding that it set off the amount of said check against the amount of his said indebtedness, which tender and demand was by said bank refused; that said offer of payment, as aforesaid, has never been withdrawn or rescinded by defendant; that said bank and plaintiff still refuse to grant to defendant a set-off of the amount represented by said check against defendant's indebtedness to said bank; that defendant and his wife, for the purpose of this statement of facts, are considered as having testified that although said deposit was in the name of his wife, the money constituting the same was the property of defendant, and that said bank account was carried in his wife's name for reasons not material to this action; that the officers of the said bank, for the purpose of this statement of facts, are considered as having testified that they had no knowledge that said deposit was the property of defendant at the time the same was made or at any time subsequent thereto; that said bank closed October 29, 1932, at 12 m. and continued to be closed until December 3, 1932, and thereafter...
To continue reading
Request your trial