Tobin v. Gulf Oil Corp.

Decision Date15 March 1982
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 81-2241.
Citation535 F. Supp. 116
PartiesTimothy TOBIN, Jr. v. GULF OIL CORPORATION.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana

Jerald Andry, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff.

Glenn G. Goodier, New Orleans, La., for Gulf Oil.

Robert Leininger, Jr., Metairie, La., for third-party defendant.

CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge.

REASONS FOR RULING

This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Gulf Oil Corporation (Gulf) for summary judgment on its third party claim for contractual indemnity against Services, Equipment & Engineering, Inc. (S.E.E.). For the reasons hereinafter set out the motion should be and it is hereby GRANTED.

This personal injury action was filed against defendant Gulf by plaintiff Timothy Tobin, Jr. who seeks damages for injuries which he allegedly sustained while employed by S.E.E. and working on Gulf's Rig No. 10 located in the Gulf of Mexico at South Timbalier Block 176E. Tobin alleges that he was injured on June 4, 1980. Suit was filed on June 4, 1981. On July 24, 1981, Gulf filed a third-party complaint against S.E.E. seeking contractual indemnity. The basis for Gulf's claim in this regard is paragraph XII of Workover Contract No. NOD-717 entered into between Gulf and S.E.E. (designated therein as Contractor) on December 13, 1979 which provides in pertinent part:

Contractor agrees: to protect, indemnify and save Gulf harmless from and against all claims, demands and causes of action, suits or other litigation (including defending all causes of action, suits or other litigation or indemnifying or holding Gulf harmless from and against all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees incurred by Gulf in the defense of such causes of action, suits or other litigation arising from operations carried on hereunder) of every kind and character arising in favor of contractor or third parties, including but not limited to personnel furnished by Contractor, on account of personal injuries or death ... whether arising out of negligence on the part of Gulf or otherwise, including any claim based upon the unseaworthiness of any vessel or upon any theory of strict liability, in any way occurring, incident to, or arising out of the operations carried on hereunder, and particularly, but not by way of limitation, against any loss or damage whatsoever caused by fire, explosions or accidents of any kind during the performance of and until the completion of such work and the acceptance thereof by Gulf ... the agreements
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Jackson v. Tenneco Oil Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • December 5, 1985
    ...1247, 1248 (E.D. La.1985); Home Ins. Co. v. Garber Industries, Inc., 588 F.Supp. 1218, 1222 (W.D.La. 1984); Tobin v. Gulf Oil Corp., 535 F.Supp. 116, 117 (E.D.La.1982). TENNECO'S CONTRACTUAL Tenneco correctly notes that the application of the Indemnity Act voids only the obligation to indem......
  • Smith v. Shell Oil Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • November 27, 1984
    ...of this act and which contract governs a specific terminable performance of a specific job or activity listed....In Tobin v. Gulf Oil Corp., 535 F.Supp. 116 (E.D.La.1982) an injury occurred on June 4, 1980 and suit was brought against Gulf which filed a third party complaint against Tobin's......
  • Hebert v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Louisiana
    • August 22, 1985
    ...injury occurs before September 11, 1981. See Smith v. Shell Oil Co., 746 F.2d 1087, 1093-94 (5th Cir.1984); Tobin v. Gulf Oil Corp., 535 F.Supp. 116, 117 (E.D.La. 1982); Great Atlantic Ins. v. Martin Services International, 445 So.2d 146, 148-49 (La.App. 3d Cir.1984). Also well-established ......
  • Rigby v. Tenneco Oil Co., Civ. A. No. 84-4107.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • April 29, 1985
    ...or activity". See id. § 9:2780(I); Home Ins. Co. v. Garber Indus., Inc., 588 F.Supp. 1218, 1222 (W.D.La. 1984); Tobin v. Gulf Oil Corp., 535 F.Supp. 116, 117 (E.D.La.1982). However, Tenneco furthers two additional arguments to prevent application of the Act in this First, Tenneco contends e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT