Toledo v. Apperson
| Decision Date | 31 January 1869 |
| Citation | Toledo v. Apperson, 49 Ill. 480, 1869 WL 5145 (Ill. 1869) |
| Parties | TOLEDO, WABASH AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANYv.WILLIAM APPERSON. |
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Champaign county; the Hon. A. J. GALLAGHER, Judge, presiding.
The opinion states the case.
Mr. A. E. HARMON, for the appellant.
Messrs. COLER & SMITH, for the appellee.
This was an action brought by the appellee, against the appellant, for injuries received by the former when traveling upon the defendant's line. The car in which the plaintiff was seated ran off the track and was overturned, causing him very serious injury, for which the jury gave him a verdict of $1,000, and the court rendered judgment on the verdict.
The verdict and judgment were unquestionably correct. The evidence shows the railway track, where the rail was broken and the accident occurred, to have been in such wretched condition as to make the company fairly chargeable with gross negligence. A part of the rails were fastened with spikes instead of chairs. Some of them were badly worn, having their ends so loose that they worked up and down with each passing car; some of the ties were broken in the middle, and the rails varied in length from nine to thirteen feet, some of them not meeting at the joints by two or two and a-half inches, the spaces being filled in with wooden plugs, and the rails only partially spiked. This was...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Grand Rapids & I. R. Co. v. Huntley
... ... Worcester R. R., 9 Cush. 24; Gonzales v. N. Y. & Harlem ... R. R. Co., 39 How. Pr., 407; Reed v. N. Y. Cent. R. R., 56 ... Barb. 493; Toledo, Wabash & Western R. R. v. Apperson, 49 ... Ill. 480 ... [38 Mich. 539] ... Campbell, ... Suit ... was ... ...
-
Chicago v. Lewis
...Railroad Co. v. Reynolds, 88 Ill. 418;White v. Railway Co., 61 Wis. 536, 21 N. W. Rep. 524;Ellet v. Railway Co., 76 Mo. 518;Railway Co. v. Apperson, 49 Ill. 480;) and so in respect of obstructions upon the track under circumstances of danger, if excessive speed of the train has proximatelyc......
- City of Springfield v. Claire
-
Indianapolis v. Hall
...with careless and negligent surroundings, such as, where the track is negligently constructed, and out of repair. Toledo, Wabash and Western Ry. Co. v. Apperson, 49 Ill. 480; Peoria, Pekin and Jacksonville R. R. Co. v. Reynolds, 88 Id. 418. The rate of speed at which a passenger train is ru......