Tonasket v. Washington, 71-1031
| Decision Date | 24 April 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 71-1031,71-1031 |
| Citation | 36 L.Ed.2d 385,93 S.Ct. 1941,411 U.S. 451 |
| Parties | Leonard TONASKET, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Robert L. Pirtle, Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
Alvin J. Ziontz, Seattle, Wash., for Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington, and others, as amici curiae, by special leave of Court.
Slade Gorton, Atty. Gen., for appellees.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court for reconsideration in light of §§ 6 and 7 of c. 157, 1972 Extraordinary Session Laws of the State of Washington, and this Court's decision in McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Comm'n, 411 U.S. 164, 93 S.Ct. 1257, 36 L.Ed.2d 129 (1973).
To continue reading
Request your trial
54 cases
- Com. v. Tarver
-
Bryan v. Itasca County, Minnesota
...83d Cong., 1st Sess. (1953). The transcript was produced by the United States during the briefing of Tonasket v. Washington, 411 U.S. 451, 93 S.Ct. 1941, 36 L.Ed.2d 385 (1973). The portion quoted in the text is reproduced in the Appendix in the instant 10 Cf. Israel & Smithson, Supra, n. 8,......
- Bundy v. State, 57772
-
Com. v. Drew
...... facts as well as the prosection's to the jury so it may decide where the truth lies." Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14, 19, 87 S.Ct. 1920, 1923, 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967). Both the United States ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 23 INDIAN WATER RIGHTS: SOME EMERGING FRONTIERS
...original.) [4] Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida, 414 U.S. 661, 678 (1974). [5] 411 U.S. 145 (1973). [6] 411 U.S. 164 (1973). [7] 411 U.S. 451 (1973). [8] 412 U.S. 481 (1973). [9] 414 U.S. 44 (1973). [10] 414 U.S. 1 (1973). [11] 420 U.S. 194 (1975). [12] 414 U.S. 661 (1974). [13] 419......