Toncrey v. State, 55388

Decision Date13 March 1985
Docket NumberNo. 55388,55388
Citation465 So.2d 1070
PartiesJames Eugene TONCREY a/k/a "Harry Toncrey" v. STATE of Mississippi.
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

J.W. Miller, Biloxi, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Atty. Gen. by Catherine Walker Underwood, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C.J., and HAWKINS and PRATHER, JJ.

PRATHER, Justice, for the Court:

This is an appeal from a criminal conviction in the Circuit Court of Harrison County, in which James Eugene Toncrey, a/k/a Harry Toncrey was convicted of burglary and sentenced as a habitual criminal to ten years without eligibility for parole at the Mississippi Department of Corrections.

Toncrey appeals assigning as sole ground for reversal that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

I.

The State's case against appellant rested upon the testimony of four witnesses. No evidence was introduced on behalf of the defendant at trial.

Rocky H. Byrd testified that his home in Biloxi was broken into on November 16, 1982. Byrd returned home that day, following notification by his wife, to find the bathroom window broken out and the window screen thrown against a nearby fence. A 12 gauge Winchester pump-shotgun and the HBO box were missing from the den area of the home. A small amount of cash was missing from the master bedroom, and several items of jewelry, including a gold necklace brooch with a diamond mounting valued at between $1200 and $1300, were missing from the extra bedroom which had been ransacked.

Mr. Byrd stated that at 2:00 o'clock a.m. on November 18, 1982, following a telephone tip, he went to the Red Garter Lounge and approached the appellant. Byrd told the appellant that he had heard that the appellant had something to sell for a good price. Appellant then produced the gold and diamond brooch necklace, which belonged to Byrd's wife and offered to sell it to Byrd for $400 or $500. Byrd attempted to restrain the appellant, but the appellant slipped free and fled the lounge. Byrd saw the appellant again about one week later in another bar and successfully detained him until law enforcement officers arrived.

Eddie Blake testified that he bought a 12 gauge shotgun from the appellant, whom he knew as "Harry", in November of 1982. Two days after purchasing the shotgun, Blake discovered it was stolen and returned it to Rocky Byrd.

Danny Poulos, the owner of Shady Oaks Bar in Biloxi, testified that the appellant came into the bar on November 17, 1982 and asked Poulos if he was interested in buying some gold.

Investigator J.J. Roberts of the Harrison County Sheriff's Department testified that he investigated the Byrd burglary but did not conduct any investigation at the Byrd residence. Roberts testified that no fingerprints or other physical evidence was recovered which would place the appellant in the Byrd home at any time. Roberts stated that no background investigation was conducted on Eddie Blake. Roberts further testified that he attempted an interrogation of the appellant nine days following the burglary at the Harrison County Jail. Roberts read the appellant his Miranda rights, and the appellant executed a waiver form. Appellant then stated that he did not wish to discuss the burglary, but that if the charges were dismissed, he could locate some of the stolen items.

II.

At the conclusion of the State's case the appellant moved for a directed verdict on the ground that the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain a conviction of burglary...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Whittington v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • March 16, 1988
    ...v. State, supra; McFee v. State, 511 So.2d 130, 134 (Miss.1987); Fisher v. State, 481 So.2d 203, 213-14 (Miss.1985); Toncrey v. State, 465 So.2d 1070, 1072 (Miss.1985); Blanks v. State, 451 So.2d 775, 779 (Miss.1984); Winters v. State, 449 So.2d 766, 771 (Miss.1984). Also, see: McGilvery v.......
  • Murphy v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • August 1, 1990
    ...is damning! There is ample evidence to support the verdict of guilty on the charge of burglary brought in by the jury. See Toncrey v. State, 465 So.2d 1070 (Miss.1985); Rushing v. State, 461 So.2d 710 We have a number of decisions, a non-exhaustive list follows, which discuss the deference ......
  • Shields v. State, 92-KA-01067-SCT
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 27, 1997
    ...We distinguished prior cases in this area which might appear inconsistent with that view. We pointed out that in Toncrey v. State, 465 So.2d 1070 (Miss.1985), there was flight as well as an offer to lead authorities to other stolen items as corroborative evidence of guilt. Id. at fn. 2. As ......
  • Ratliff v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 4, 1987
    ...outlined above is more than sufficient to support that verdict. See McFee v. State, 511 So.2d 130, 134 (Miss.1987); Toncrey v. State, 465 So.2d 1070, 1072 (Miss.1985); Blanks v. State, 451 So.2d 775, 779 (Miss.1984); Winters v. State, 449 So.2d 766, 771 (Miss.1984); see also Fisher v. State......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT