Tourtelot v. Booker
Decision Date | 26 June 1913 |
Citation | 160 S.W. 293 |
Parties | TOURTELOT et al. v. BOOKER. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; A. M. Walthall, Judge.
Action by E. C. Tourtelot and others against L. E. Booker. Judgment for the defendant, and plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
McBroom & Scott, of El Paso, for appellants. Turney & Burges, T. A. Falvey, and Stanton & Weeks, all of El Paso, for appellee.
Appellants E. C. Tourtelot and T. D. Hogan filed this suit on the 21st day of September, 1911, in the district court of El Paso county, Tex., against appellee, L. E. Booker, to recover upon a judgment rendered in a district court of North Dakota. Trial was had before a jury upon plaintiff's first amended original petition, the defendant's answer, and the plaintiffs' first and second supplemental petitions. The judgment sued upon is alleged to be as follows:
It is alleged, in substance, in the trial petition that the said Tourtelot, at the time of the recovery of said judgment, was receiver of the Grand Forks National Bank of Grand Forks, N. D., and that the court rendering the judgment was a court of record, having general jurisdiction, and had jurisdiction of the person of the defendant and of the subject-matter, and that under the laws of the state of North Dakota the judgment entered became a valid and binding judgment for the amount in said judgment stipulated in favor of said Tourtelot as receiver and against the said Booker, and that the said Tourtelot as receiver and the said Booker were the only parties to the suit. It was also alleged that at the time of bringing this suit the said judgment was valid and of full force and virtue in the state of North Dakota, and that the judgment in North Dakota had not been appealed from nor set aside; that no part of it had been paid; that the entire amount was due and owing, and under the laws of Texas it was enforceable against the defendant. It was also alleged that after said judgment was obtained in the district court of North Dakota the said Tourtelot resigned as receiver of said bank, and that one W. B. Wood was appointed and qualified as receiver in his stead; that thereafter the said Wood, as receiver of said bank, acting under proper authority, sold said judgment, and that by due course of assignment appellants became the owners of same, and entitled to recovery thereon, and that under the laws of the state of North Dakota the said judgment bears interest at the rate of 7 per cent. per annum from its date, and that appellants should recover of defendant the amount of the judgment, with interest thereon at 7 per cent. per annum.
The defendant answered, alleging, in substance, that the district court of North Dakota was without jurisdiction to hear and determine said cause against him, or to enter judgment against him, because he was not served with any process issuing out of said court in a suit then pending, nor did he enter appearance or confess judgment in any suit pending against him in said state, and that the judgment sued upon for said reason was null and void. Defendant also pleaded the 10-year statute of limitation of the state of North Dakota and of the state of Texas as a defense against appellants' recovery against him upon said judgment, and further alleged...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Juneau Spruce Corp. v. INTERNATIONAL LONG. & W. UNION
...the judgment was only "dormant" and could be revived and thus should be allowed as the basis for a suit in Montana. Tourtelot v. Booker, Tex.Civ.App.1913, 160 S.W. 293 involved a "dead" judgment. Chapman v. Chapman, 1892, 48 Kan. 636, 29 P. 1071 is a case supporting the judgment debtor's po......
-
Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Deyle
...of courts of record it speaks of courts whose proceedings are duly recorded by some authorized person or persons." Tourtelot v. Booker, 160 S.W. 293, 297 (Tex.Civ.App.1913). Thus, a court which is required by law to keep a permanent and written memorialization of determinations made in proc......
-
Lawrence Systems, Inc. By and Through Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corp. v. Superior Feeders, Inc.
...judgments. M'Elmoyle v. Cohen, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 312, 10 L.Ed. 177 (1839). In that regard, the court in Tourtelot v. Booker, 160 S.W. 293 (Tex.Civ.App.--El Paso 1913, writ ref'd), determined that the predecessor to section 16.066(b) passed constitutional Texas courts recognize at least two ......
-
Schofield v. Baker
...jurisdiction is void. Ellis v. Lytle, 27 Kan. 707, 41 Am.Rep. 434; Richardson v. Turner, 52 La.Ann. 1613, 28 So. 158; Tourtelot v. Booker (Tex.) 160 S.W. 293. reading of the order of sale is conclusive of the fact that the receiver was limited to a sale of personal and chattel property. No ......