Toussie v. Allstate Ins. Co., Case No. 14-CV-2705 (FB) (CLP)
| Decision Date | 30 September 2016 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 14-CV-2705 (FB) (CLP) |
| Citation | 213 F.Supp.3d 444 |
| Parties | Robert TOUSSIE, Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; Alan Rodriguez Insurance Agency, Inc.; George J. Schlott, Inc.; Alan Rodriguez, individually; and George J. Schlott, individually, Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York |
For the Plaintiff: MARK E. GOIDELL, ESQ., 666 Old Country Road, Suite 700, Garden City, New York 11530
For Defendant Allstate Insurance Co.: J. MICHAEL PENNEKAMP, ESQ., Fowler White Burnett, P.A., 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor Miami, Florida, 33131, PATRICK W. BROPHY, ESQ., McMahon, Martine & Gallagher, LLP, 55 Washington Street, Suite 270, Brooklyn, New York 11201
On January 25, 2016, defendant Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstate") moved to dismiss the complaint against it pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). While the motion was pending, and prior to answer, Allstate and the plaintiff both moved for summary judgment under Rule 56. All motions are outstanding.
During oral argument on the motions, the parties referenced facts—apparently undisputed—that may have some bearing on the just resolution of this case. Although the plaintiff seeks to recover for the damages occasioned by Hurricane Sandy to one of his properties on the ground that Allstate incorrectly applied the premium payment to a different policy covering another one of the plaintiff's properties damaged by Hurricane Sandy, he apparently previously recovered on the policy to which the payment was incorrectly applied. Thus, if summary judgment were granted to the plaintiff, he would arguably be the recipient of a windfall since he would receive a double recovery for the same single premium payment. "[C]ourts can and should preclude double recovery by an individual." General Tel. Co. v. EEOC , 446 U.S. 318, 333, 100 S.Ct. 1698, 64 L.Ed.2d 319 (1980). Yet, since summary judgment is sought prior to answer, granting summary judgment to plaintiff at this stage of the litigation would preclude Allstate from answering and raising affirmative defenses or counterclaims relative to this issue.
Rule 56(b) allows a summary judgment motion to be made "at any time." But courts routinely deny motions for summary judgment as premature when discovery over relevant matters is incomplete. See, e.g. , Miller v. Beneficial Mgmt. Corp. , 977 F.2d 834, 846 (3d Cir.1992) (); Murrell v. Bennett , 615 F.2d 306, 310 (5th Cir.1980) (). They have also recognized that "in many cases [a motion for summary judgment] will be premature until the nonmovant has had time to file a responsive pleading." Helios Int'l S.A.R.L. v. Cantamessa USA, Inc. , 23 F.Supp.3d 173, 188–89 (S.D.N.Y.2014) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Advisory Committee Notes).
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1 directs district courts to apply the federal rules to secure a "just, speedy, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., National Ass'n v. Telos CLO 1006-1 Ltd.
...the parties had an opportunity to file responsive pleadings to the claims that are the subject of the motion. Toussie v. Allstate Insurance Co., 213 F.Supp.3d 444 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)."The purpose of a statutory interpleader action is to avoid the problem of multiple, conflicting claims to a sin......
-
Chachkes v. David
...or else an unelaborated exercise of judicial discretion that diverges from the Court's instant judgment, see Toussie v. Allstate Ins. Co., 213 F. Supp. 3d 444, 446 (E.D.N.Y. 2016) (declining to decide a motion for summary judgment because it would be "manifestly unjust and a waste of judici......
-
Upstate N.Y. Eng'rs Health Fund v. John F. & John P. Wenzel Contractors, Inc.
.... . . have engaged in significant discovery" about the issues most relevant to the Motion. Reply Mem. at 10; see Toussie v. Allstate Ins. Co., 213 F. Supp. 3d 444, 445-46 ("[C]ourts routinely deny motions for summary judgment as premature when discovery over relevant matters is incomplete."......
-
Arc Controls, Inc. v. M/V NOR GOLIATH
...routinely deny motions for summary judgment as premature when discovery over relevant matters is incomplete." Toussie v. Allstate Ins. Co., 213 F. Supp. 3d 444, 445 (E.D.N.Y. 2016) (citing Miller v. Beneficial Mgmt. Corp., 977 F.2d 834, 846 (3d Cir. 1992); Murrell v. Bennet, 615 F.2d 306, 3......