Tower v. Fletcher

• Court: U.S. Supreme Court
• Writing for the Court: WAITE
• Citation: Tower v. Fletcher, 114 U.S. 127, 5 S.Ct. 799, 29 L.Ed. 117 (1885)
• Decision Date: 30 March 1885
• Parties: TOWER v. FLETCHER. (Two Cases.)

114 U.S. 127

5 S.Ct. 799

29 L.Ed. 117

TOWER v. FLETCHER. (Two Cases.)

March 30, 1885.

M. D. Brainard and J. K. Redington, for motions.

Wm. J. Johnston, in opposition.

WAITE, C. J.

These motions are made on the ground that the judgments for the review of which the writs of error were sued out are not final judgments. The judgment in each case is that the judgment of the state district court 'be, and the same is hereby, reversed, with costs, with directions to the superior court of Los Angeles county to enter judgment upon the findings for the plaintiff as prayed for in his complaint.' That judgment is final for the purposes of a writ of error to this court, which terminates the litigation between the parties on the merits of the case, so that, if there should be an affirmance here, the court below would have nothing to do but to execute the judgment it had already rendered. Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3; S. C. 1 SUP. CT. REP. 15, and the numerous cases there cited. The judgments in these cases are of that character. The litigation is ended, and the rights of the parties on the merits have been fully determined. Nothing remains to be done but to require the inferior court to perform the ministerial...