Towers v. United Rys. & Elec. Co. of Baltimore
Decision Date | 24 June 1915 |
Docket Number | 44. |
Parties | TOWERS et al., Public Service Commission, v. UNITED RYS. & ELECTRIC CO. OF BALTIMORE. |
Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City; Henry Duffy Judge.
"To be officially reported."
Suit by the United Railways & Electric Company of Baltimore against Albert G. Towers and others, constituting the Public Service Commission of Maryland. From a decree granting relief to complainant, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Osborne I. Yellott, of Baltimore (W. Cabell Bruce, of Baltimore, on the brief), for appellants. Albert R. Stuart and Joseph C France, both of Baltimore (J. Stanislaus Cook, of Baltimore on the brief), for appellee.
This railway was one of the constituent companies which entered into the consolidation by which the appellee company was created.
The turnpike was constructed from the city limits to a village called Jerusalem, in Harford county. The railway was constructed upon the turnpike under the following circumstances: By deed dated April 1, 1895, the turnpike company, in consideration of $5,000, granted to Simon J. Martenet, his heirs, personal representatives, and assigns, subject to existing mortgages on the pike, right of way, and franchises, "the right to construct and maintain and operate an electric railway upon the turnpike road of the said turnpike company from North avenue, in Baltimore city, to the end of said turnpike road, upon the following conditions." The conditions set out in the deed, 20 in number, related for the most part to the location, character, and construction of the railway. It was provided that Martenet, his personal representatives and assigns, should lay a double track along the center of said turnpike from North avenue to a point on said turnpike two miles northeasterly of North avenue, at or near Gardenville, with a flat or girder rail, and that from Gardenville a single or double track should be laid on the side of the turnpike. The seventh, seventeenth, and twentieth conditions are as follows:
Subsequently, in May, 1895, Martenet, "in consideration of his agreeing to build an electric railway on said turnpike," secured agreements from the mortgage bondholders of the turnpike to release from the operation of the mortgages all the franchises, rights of way, and privileges given by the turnpike company to him, and also to release all the cars, poles, wires, rails, and all of the property of every kind to be acquired by him or his assigns in the construction and maintenance of the railway. These agreements were reported to the circuit court for Baltimore county in the receivership proceedings pending against the turnpike company, and by an order of that court passed June 4, 1895, trustees were appointed with authority and direction to execute formal releases from the liens of the mortgages. By the deed referred to Martenet secured for himself, his heirs, personal representatives, and assigns, the right to build the proposed railway on the turnpike, and the obligations of himself, his personal representatives and assigns, were fixed, and by the releases mentioned his franchises and railway property, etc., were freed from the operation of the mortgages. In this way he obtained the right and clear title to build the railway from the city limits to Jerusalem, the northeasterly terminus of the turnpike, and he obligated himself and his personal representatives and assigns to build the road in the manner and within the time provided and set forth in the deed.
By deed dated July 13, 1896, Martenet granted and conveyed to the Baltimore, Gardenville & Bel Air Electric Railway Company all the rights and franchises and privileges conveyed and granted to him by the turnpike company by the deed of April 1, 1895. On September 7, 1896, the Baltimore & Jerusalem Turnpike Company passed the following resolution:
"Resolved that the company does hereby confirm to Simon J. Martenet the right to construct, maintain, and operate an electric railway upon the turnpike from North avenue to the end thereof, and in consideration of the payments heretofore made by him the said Simon J. Martenet be released from the payment of any further sum or sums of money other than the sums heretofore paid by him, and that the said Simon J. Martenet shall have the option of constructing said railway for the entire length of the same on either side of said turnpike or in the middle thereof by either a single or double track."
When this resolution was passed Martenet had failed to perform his obligations under the deed of April 1, 1895; he had not paid the consideration expressed in the deed, and he had not completed four miles of the road within the limit of time specified therein; but shortly after the passage of the resolution the Baltimore, Gardenville & Bel Air Electric Railway Company constructed the road to Overlea, a distance of about 3 1/2 miles.
By deed dated March 4, 1899, the date of the consolidation, the Baltimore, Gardenville & Bel Air Electric Railway Company granted and conveyed to the United Railways & Electric Company of Baltimore all its railways, wherever located and owned, acquired, or operated, and which it was authorized to build, and all its property, real, personal, and mixed, and all its entire equipment, and all its rights in existing contracts or agreements with individuals or corporations, and all the appurtenances, rights, franchises, privileges, and especially the franchise to be a corporation, and all the franchises held by it, by any act, grant, or thing, or by virtue of any ordinances of the mayor and city council of Baltimore, or any permit of the county commissioners and any other franchises held by it in any manner whatsoever. The United Railways Company, by virtue...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Public Service Commission
... ... Baltimore City; H. Arthur Stump, Judge ... 1917 B, 1144; Public Service Commission v. United ... Railways Co., 126 Md. 478, 95 A. 170; Havre De Grace ... 768, Ann. Cas. 1916D, 1030; Yeatman v ... Towers (1915) 126 Md. 513, 95 A. 158; Pennsylvania ... Railroad ... ...
-
State ex rel. City of Carthage v. Public Service Commission of Missouri
... ... Philadelphia B. & W. R. Co., 122 ... Md. 438; Towers v. United R. & Electric Co., 126 Md ... 478. (4) Where a ... Co., 44 L. R ... A. 692; Stiles v. Citizens St. Elec. R. Co., 19 L. R. A. (N ... L ... H ... ...
-
The State ex rel. Ozark Power & Water Co. v. Public Service Commission
... ... Railway Commission, 173 Cal. 577, 160 P. 828; Towers ... v. United Rys. & El. Co., 126 Md. 478; Public ... ...
-
Benson v. Maloy {State report title: Benson v. Public Service Commission}
...controlling principle in cases of this kind better or more distinctly set out than in the opinion of Judge Burke in the P. S. C. v. United Rwy. & Electric Co., 126 Md. 478, 95 A. 170, in which quotes with approval the language of Justice Gray in the N. P. R. R. Co. v. Dustin, 142 U.S. 492, ......