Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

Town of Foxfield v. Archdiocese of Denver

Document Cited authorities 26 Cited in 14 Precedent Map Related
Decision Date10 August 2006
Citation148 P.3d 339
Docket Number05CA0202
PartiesTOWN OF FOXFIELD, Colorado, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. The ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and Monsignor Edward L. Buelt, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant, and United States Department of Justice, Intervenor.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Bartnick v. City of Englewood
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • 30 June 2012
    ...even if they incidentally burden a particular religious practice or belief) (footnote omitted)); see also Town of Foxfield v. Archdiocese of Denver, 148 P.3d 339, 346 (Colo.App. 2006). Here the Court finds that Ordinance 55 was enacted to eliminate boarding houses in R-l-C residential zones......
  • Martin v. Union Pacific R. Co.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 20 September 2007
    ...the trial court to consider the letter and make appropriate findings under section 13-21-102(3)(b). See Town of Foxfield v. Archdiocese of Denver, 148 P.3d 339, 347 (Colo.App.2006) (a trial court ruling made with an incorrect legal standard must be reversed and the case remanded to afford t......
  • Core-Mark Midcontinent Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 11 February 2016
    ...and remand for a new trial, Sonitrol's conditional cross-appeal is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss it. See Town of Foxfield v. Archdiocese of Denver, 148 P.3d 339, 347 (Colo. App. 2006).IV. Conclusion¶ 68 The judgment is affirmed and Sonitrol's conditional cross-appeal is dismissed.JUDGE BOOR......
  • People v. Ray
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 8 March 2018
    ...burden on a religious practice must be narrowly tailored to advance a compelling governmental interest." Town of Foxfield v. Archdiocese of Denver , 148 P.3d 339, 346 (Colo. App. 2006) ; see Wisconsin v. Yoder , 406 U.S. 205, 215, 220, 92 S.Ct. 1526, 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972) ; Sherbert v. Verne......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT