Town of Helena v. Country Mobile Homes, Inc.
Decision Date | 15 August 1980 |
Citation | 387 So.2d 162 |
Parties | The TOWN OF HELENA, Alabama, a Municipal Corporation v. COUNTRY MOBILE HOMES, INC., a corporation, et al. 79-258. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Conrad M. Fowler, Jr. of Wallace, Ellis, Head & Fowler, Columbiana, for appellant.
Richard W. Bell, Pelham, for appellees.
This appeal is from a judgment, adverse to plaintiff The Town of Helena and favorable to defendants Country Mobile Homes and Joseph Carrier, holding that a structure assembled or installed on a building site in Helena was not a mobile home and therefore not in violation of a zoning ordinance of the Town. We affirm.
Under the facts of the case was the subject structure a mobile home within the definition of the Helena zoning ordinance?
There was in force and effect in Helena a zoning ordinance which contained the following provisions:
After a trial ore tenus, where the testimony was in sharp conflict and during which the trial court viewed the building site and structure, the following findings of fact were made:
These findings are amply supported by the evidence.
The evidence shows that the structure, subject of this litigation, was being installed or assembled on a site in a subdivision which contains no restrictive covenants applicable to homes situated in it. Therefore, if not prohibited by the provisions of the zoning ordinance set out above, there is no impediment to defendants' structure being located in that subdivision in Helena. We point out that the exhibits which are photographs of the subject structure and other structures in the subdivision disclose that defendants' structure resembles the other structures, which the evidence shows to be conventional "stick-build" homes, rather than what is commonly considered a mobile home. Also, we note that the structure contains approximately 1776 square feet of floor space with three bedrooms and two full baths, and costs concerning the structure expended to date of filing of this action, at which time...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Collins v. Windsor
...Smith v. Smith, 482 So.2d 1172 (Ala.1985); Belcher v. Versatile Farm Equipment Co., 443 So.2d 912 (Ala.1983); Town of Helena v. Country Mobile Homes, Inc., 387 So.2d 162 (Ala.1980). Collins also argues that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for new trial on the ground tha......
-
Schwartz v. McAtee
...occupied as living quarters. A metamorphosis has occurred; the mobile vehicle has become a fixed residence." Cf. Helena v. Country Mobile Homes, Inc. (Ala.1980), 387 So.2d 162 (the structure in question is a modular, not a mobile home); Woodstock v. Boddy (1978), 240 Ga. 477, 241 S.E.2d 236......
-
Bryan v. Board of Adjustment of City of Arab
...of the legislative body as it is expressed in the ordinance. Shelton v. Wright, 439 So.2d 55 (Ala.1983); Town of Helena v. Country Mobile Homes, Inc., 387 So.2d 162 (Ala.1980). When it is necessary to construe an ordinance which imposes restrictions upon the use of private property, it must......
-
U-Totem of Alabama, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of City of Huntsville
...in favor of the trial court's judgment, and its decision will not be disturbed unless palpably wrong. Town of Helena v. Country Mobile Homes, Inc., 387 So.2d 162 (Ala.1980); COME v. Chancy, 289 Ala. 555, 269 So.2d 88 (1972). We find no palpable error The record clearly reflects that the hou......