Town of Klamath Falls v. Sachs

Decision Date29 May 1899
PartiesTOWN OF KLAMATH FALLS v. SACHS et al.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Klamath county; H.K. Hanna, Judge.

Action by the town of Klamath Falls against Lipman Sachs and others for injunction. There was a decree for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

This is a suit to enjoin the prosecution of an action commenced by Lipman Sachs against the plaintiff herein to recover upon two coupons for interest payments upon two certain bonds purporting to have been issued by it to H.V. Gates, to restrain the collection of such coupons, and to have the bonds themselves declared null and void. The bonds to which the coupons are attached are in form as follows: "For value received, the town of Klamath Falls, in the county of Klamath, state of Oregon, promises to pay to the bearer at the Chase National Bank, in the city of New York, state of New York, on the first day of September, A.D.1915, one thousand dollars, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent. per annum from September 1st, A.D.1895, interest to be paid semiannually on the first days of September and March in each and every year thereafter, at the same place, on the presentation and surrender of the coupons for such interest hereto attached, as they respectively become due. Principal and interest payable in United States gold coin of the present standard of weight and fineness. This bond is one of a series of ten bonds of one thousand dollars each, of like tenor, and even date herewith, numbered consecutively from one to ten, both numbers inclusive, issued by the town of Klamath Falls. This bond is issued by the town of Klamath Falls for the purpose of providing electric lights and water for the inhabitants of said town by and under authority of an act of the legislature of the state of Oregon, filed in the office of the secretary of state February 6th, A.D.1893, and entitled 'An act to incorporate the town of Klamath Falls, Oregon,' *** and by virtue of Ordinance No. 46 of said town of Klamath Falls, duly passed by the board of trustees of said town on the 6th day of April, A.D. 1895 [giving the full title of the ordinance]. It is hereby recited that all acts and things required to be done precedent to and on the issuing of this bond have been done and performed in regular and due manner and form as required by law, and that the total indebtedness of said town of Klamath Falls, including this issue of bonds, does not exceed the limit prescribed by law; and for the prompt payment of the principal and interest hereof at maturity the full faith and credit of the said town of Klamath Falls are hereby irrevocably pledged." They are duly executed, and bear date August 7, 1895. On April 6, 1895, the plaintiff's board of trustees adopted Ordinance No. 45, providing for supplying the town and its inhabitants with electric lights and power for public and private purposes, and granting H.V Gates, his successors and assigns, a franchise and license to construct and operate a system of electric lighting and power works in the town, contracting with him for the rental of electric lights for illuminating the town, and reserving an option to purchase the same. Ordinance No. 46, adopted at the same time, is similar in effect, except that it provides for the construction of a water system instead, and the issuance of the bonds in controversy. It is entitled "An ordinance providing for the supplying of the town of Klamath Falls, Oregon, and its inhabitants, with water for public and private purposes, and granting H.V. Gates a franchise and license to construct and operate a system of waterworks in the town of Klamath Falls, Oregon, contracting with the said H.V. Gates for the rental of fire hydrants for supplying the town of Klamath Falls, Oregon, with water, and giving the town of Klamath Falls, Oregon, an option to purchase said waterworks, and providing for payment to said H.V. Gates of ten thousand dollars in bonds of the town of Klamath Falls as a first payment on said option to purchase the said waterworks and for rentals of hydrants for the town of Klamath Falls, Oregon." It provides, in substance, so far as it is necessary to be set out for an understanding of the opinion, as follows:

"Section 1. That H.V. Gates, his successors and assigns, are granted the privilege for and during the term of ten years to construct, maintain and operate a system of waterworks in the town of Klamath Falls, for supplying the said town and inhabitants thereof with water for public and private purposes."

"Sec 4. That the grantee shall provide a substantial engine house of sufficient capacity to accommodate pumps and appliances of waterworks, and such room as may be required to accommodate the electric plant to be operated in conjunction with said waterworks system."

"Sec 6. That the grantee shall furnish and lay to the reservoir in the streets of said town, at a specified depth, not less than four thousand feet of six-inch pipe and two thousand feet of four-inch pipe, and as much more as may be deemed necessary shall furnish ten double hydrants, and connect the same with the mains; also all necessary valves, special fittings, and valve boxes required to complete the works; the mains and fittings to be ample and capable of carrying out the provisions and intentions of this agreement, of affording the town where said pipes are laid first-class fire protection, and of sustaining a pressure of one hundred and fifty pounds to the square inch; shall furnish all mains and laterals that may from time to time be required to supply the town or its inhabitants with water: provided, that for each eight hundred feet of four inch, or larger, mains ordered by the town, there shall be one hydrant ordered, and rental paid for use of the same.

"Sec. 7. That the grantee is to keep the fire hydrants in good repair, protect same from freezing, and keep them ready at all times for instant service.

"Sec. 8. That the privilege granted to and vested in the said H.V. Gates, his successors and assigns, shall remain in full force and effect for and during the period of ten years, but subject to the right of purchase by the town; and the town of Klamath Falls rents of the grantee, for the use designated, the ten hydrants mentioned and provided for during the same period of time from the acceptance of said waterworks."

"Sec. 10. That for and in consideration of the benefits secured to the town of Klamath Falls by reason of the construction of the water plant and the use of the hydrants aforesaid, the town of Klamath Falls covenants and agrees to issue to the grantee its bonds in the sum of ten thousand dollars, in denominations as demanded by the said grantee, said bonds to draw interest at the rate of six per cent. per annum, payable semiannually, and to be delivered to said grantee upon the completion of said water plant, and when the same has successfully stood the required tests: provided, the said grantee shall satisfactorily show that said works are free from all liens, and that all labor and materials used and furnished have been paid for.

"Sec. 11. That at the expiration of ten years from the completion of said works, and at the end of each five years thereafter, the town of Klamath Falls shall have the option to purchase and own said waterworks and appurtenances and franchises upon the following conditions, and the grantee in accepting this ordinance expressly covenants to sell and convey to the town the said waterworks and system as a whole: The said town of Klamath Falls, by resolution of its board of trustees, shall determine to purchase and own said waterworks and shall serve a certified copy of such resolution on the grantee at least six months before the time when the said town may exercise such option. The sum of money that said town shall pay for said waterworks as a whole shall be an amount which at eight per cent. interest would produce an annual income equal to the net income during the year previous to the serving of the notice of resolution, with the cost price added for any improvements or extension made during the year previous to such notice, upon which no revenue has been derived. When such purchase is made by the town, the franchise granted to Gates shall terminate. If said town shall not determine to purchase said waterworks within ten years from date of its acceptance of said works, it shall grant to the grantee a franchise, upon the same terms and conditions as herein stated, reserving the option of purchase each five years. The ten thousand dollars paid for hydrant rental shall be the first payment upon the purchase price of said waterworks, and it is agreed that, until such time as the town shall purchase, it shall own an absolute right and interest in the said waterworks and electric lights to be erected and operated along with the water plant to the amount of ten thousand dollars; but it is further understood that until such time as the town shall purchase the interest of the grantee the grantee shall have exclusive use and control of said works in every particular, without paying to the town any rents, profits, or revenues therefrom or therefor in any manner whatever, except that the grantee shall not have the power or authority to sell, mortgage, lease, or in any way incumber the interest of the town of Klamath Falls in said works."

"Sec. 15. That, in the event it is necessary at any future time for the safety and welfare of the town to increase the capacity of wells, reservoirs or machinery, it shall be done by the grantee without any additional cost to the town, except in the purchase of said works, according to the conditions herein stated.

"Sec 16. That work shall be begun in a specified time, and the system...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Bolton v. Wharton
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 14 Octubre 1931
    ...and provisions of the ordinance." 44 Corpus Juris 1244, § 4237; Risley v. Howell (1893) 57 F. 544, 547; Klamath Falls v. Sachs (1899) 35 Or. 325, 57 P. 329, 76 Am. St. Rep. 501, 509. If then the defendant be chargeable with notice of the minutes referred to in the recitals in the original a......
  • Bolton v. Wharton
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 14 Octubre 1931
    ... ... R. A. (N. S.) 454; Farr-Barnes Lumber ... [163 S.C. 252] Co. v. Town" of St. George (1924) 128 S.C ... 67, 112 S.E. 24 ...         \xC2" ... Howell (1893) ... 57 F. 544, 547; Klamath Falls v. Sachs (1899) 35 Or ... 325, 57 P. 329, 76 Am. St. Rep. 501, ... ...
  • Nelson v. McAllister Dist. Imp. Co.
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 1 Diciembre 1936
    ... ... These facts bring ... them within the rules stated in Klamath Falls v ... Sachs, 35 Or. 325, 57 P. 329, 334, 76 Am.St.Rep. 501, ... ...
  • Bank of Commerce v. Huddleston
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 28 Febrero 1927
    ...then placed in the city treasury, to be expended in the same manner as the general revenue of the city. In Town of Klamath Falls v. Sachs, 35 Or. 325, 57 P. 329, 76 Am. St. Rep. 501, Page 426 Supreme Court of Oregon held that, under a statute authorizing a municipal corporation to furnish i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT