Town of Potosi v. Casey
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | RICHARDSON |
| Citation | Town of Potosi v. Casey, 27 Mo. 372 (Mo. 1858) |
| Decision Date | 31 October 1858 |
| Parties | THE TOWN OF POTOSI, Appellant, v. CASEY, Respondent. |
1. In a suit instituted in behalf of a town, under the 14th section of the act concerning towns (R. C. 1855, p. 1528), to recover of an individual a tax levied on his property, the defendant cannot show that there was inequality in the valuation by the assessor of the taxable property of the town.
Appeal from Washington Circuit Court.
Carter, for appellant.
Frissell, for respondent.
The town of Potosi brought an action against the defendant, under the authority of the 14th section of the act concerning towns (R. C. 1855, p. 1528), to recover the corporation tax levied on his property. No instructions were asked or given, and the only question presented by the record for our consideration arises on the plaintiff's exception to the admission of improper testimony. The defendant was allowed to prove, against the plaintiff's objection, that there wasinequality in the valuation by the assessor of the taxable property in the town, and witnesses were permitted to give their opinions of the relative value of particular pieces of property, as that H.'s lot...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
The State ex rel. Garth v. Switzler
...Cooley on Tax. [2 Ed.] 363, 364; Stuart v. Palmer, 74 N.Y. 191; Cooley's Const. Lim. 355; Campbell v. Dwiggins, 83 Ind. 473; Potosi v. Carey, 27 Mo. 372; State Spencer, 114 Mo. 574; In re McPherson, 104 N.Y. 306; Wallace v. Meyers, 38 F. 184; State v. Hamlin, 86 Me. 495. (2) Such enactments......
-
Boonville National Bank v. Schlotzhauer
... ... State ex rel. v. Bank of Neosho, 120 Mo. 161; ... Meyer v. Rosenblaat, 78 Mo. 495; Potosi v ... Casey, 27 Mo. 372. (a) When the tax is illegal, one is ... not obliged to apply for an ... ...
-
Boonville Nat. Bank v. Schlotzauer, County Collector
...134 Mo. 212, 35 S. W. 589; State ex rel. v. Bank of Neosho, 120 Mo. 161, 25 S. W. 372; Meyer v. Rosenblatt, 78 Mo. 405; and Potosi v. Casey, 27 Mo. 372; but these cases do not rule a state of facts that we have in the case before us. The uppermost question here (stated, supra) is not in tho......
-
City of St. Louis v. Richeson
...is in conflict with the United States Constitution as well as that of Missouri. To fix a conclusive (Cooley on Tax., pp. 450, 460; Potosi v. Casey, 27 Mo. 372), lien upon real estate (which can only be released by payment), without notice to the owner or opportunity given him to be heard in......