Townsend v. Chaillett
| Decision Date | 28 October 1931 |
| Docket Number | No. 7632.,7632. |
| Citation | Townsend v. Chaillett, 45 S.W.2d 354 (Tex. App. 1931) |
| Parties | TOWNSEND et al. v. CHAILLETT et al. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Brown County; E. J. Miller, Judge.
Suit by Nannie Townsend and husband against Augusta Chaillett and others. From the judgment, plaintiffs appeal.
Reversed and rendered.
Works & Bassett, of Amarillo, and Woodruff & Holloway, of Brownwood, for appellants.
Wilkinson & Wilkinson, of Brownwood, for appellees.
Appellant Nannie Townsend, the only child of John Chaillett and his first wife Bettie Chaillett, both deceased, sued appellees, Augusta Chaillett, the second wife of John Chaillett, and their twelve children in trespass to try title to recover the Joseph Young 640-acre survey in Brown county. By another count in her petition, appellant alleged that her mother, Bettie Chaillett, out of her separate funds, loaned Harris G. Smith $1,000, with which he purchased the land in controversy; that Smith never repaid the loan during the lifetime of Bettie Chaillett, but that after her death her husband, John Chaillett, accepted a deed from Harris G. Smith and wife to F. W. Schinkoth and a deed from Schinkoth to himself in final settlement and satisfaction of the loan; and that a constructive trust thereby arose in the land to the extent of her inherited interest in the purchase money.
Answering special issues, the jury found that out of her separate funds Bettie Chaillett loaned Harris G. Smith $1,000 with which he purchased the land in controversy; that after the death of Bettie Chaillett the land was conveyed by Smith to Schinkoth and by Schinkoth to John Chaillett in final settlement and satisfaction of the loan. Notwithstanding these findings of the jury, the trial court refused appellant judgment upon the constructive trust pleaded, and granted appellees' motion "to render judgment in their favor on the undisputed evidence," and allowed appellant only an undivided one twenty-sixth interest in the land as heir of her father, subject to the life estate of Augusta Chaillett; hence this appeal.
We think that the evidence on the issue of whether a constructive trust in the land arose in favor of appellant to the extent of her inherited interest in the purchase money was sufficiently clear and satisfactory to require the submission of the issue to the jury; and that the court erred in disregarding the findings of the jury on the issue.
Wm. H. Greer et al. conveyed the land to Harris G. Smith by deeds dated in 1885 and 1886. Will Middleton, a man about 60 years of age, testified that during Christmas week of the year 1886 or 1887, Harris G. Smith and his wife lived on the land, and on that date the following occurred:
Witness Middleton further testified that a few days after the above transactions Greer, Smith, and John Chaillett went to Brownwood in a wagon; that Greer lived in another state; and that he never saw him again. Appellant was born January 15, 1886. Her mother, Bettie Chaillett, died intestate January 16, 1888, leaving appellant and John Chaillett as her only heirs. July 11, 1889, Augusta Chaillett became the second wife of John Chaillett. Shortly after this marriage they and the Harris G. Smith family moved to Fort Bend county. The Chailletts returned to Brown county after a few years, but the Smith family never returned, and the record shows that Harris G. Smith was dead at the time of the trial of this cause. Soon after the Chailletts returned, John Chaillett came to the home of witness Middleton, and together they went to the land now in controversy. There John Chaillett offered to sell him the land for $1,000, and, concerning Chaillett's taking the place over for the debt, Middleton testified as follows:
Middleton further testified that the year before Chaillett died he told witness that he expected Nannie (appellant) to give the rest of the family (appellees) lots of trouble concerning the land.
Smith's possession of the land through his tenants was followed immediately by Chaillett's possession through his tenants and in person, which continued until Chaillett's death January 29, 1929, since which time his widow and some of the appellees have been in possession.
The trial court made the following special finding of fact: "I find that the plaintiff, Nannie Townsend, first learned that her mother had loaned Harris G. Smith One Thousand ($1000.00) Dollars to pay the purchase money notes on the land involved herein, and first learned that she, Nannie Townsend, had an interest in said land during the month of April, 1929."
This finding was in no way attacked.
The deed records of Brown county show the following transactions pertinent to this controversy: By two deeds, the first dated May 12, 1885, recorded June 15, 1900, and the second dated August 17, 1886, recorded September 16, 1886, Wm. Greer conveyed the land in suit to Harris G. Smith, each deed reciting a cash consideration of $1,000. By a deed dated January 10, 1896, recorded June 15, 1900, H. G. Smith and wife Josephine conveyed the land to F. W. Schinkoth, and recited the following as consideration: "* * * For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, to us in hand paid by F. W. Schinkoth, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and for the further consideration that on the 26th day of December, 1894, the said H. G. Smith...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Adams v. Adams
... ... one case referring to the weight of parol evidence necessary ... to establish a resulting trust. That decision is Townsend ... v. Chaillett (Tex. Civ. App.), 45 S.W.2d 354, 357(4) ... There the sole child and heir of the deceased first wife of C ... sued his widow ... ...
-
Baines v. Ray
...Bird v. Pace, 26 Tex. 487; Hays v. Hays, 66 Tex. 606, 1 S.W. 895; Krenz v. Strohmeir, Tex.Civ.App., 177 S.W. 178; Townsend v. Chaillett, Tex.Civ.App., 45 S.W.2d 354; and Negel v. Kiibler, Tex.Civ.App., 212 S.W.2d Able counsel for appellants, thus, clearly and frankly, in their brief-in mate......