Township of East Oakland v. Skinner
Decision Date | 01 October 1876 |
Citation | 24 L.Ed. 125,94 U.S. 255 |
Parties | TOWNSHIP OF EAST OAKLAND v. SKINNER |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois.
This was an action of assumpsit on fifty-four coupons cut from certain bonds issued by the township of East Oakland, Ill., in payment of its subscription of $75,000 to the capital stock of the Paris and Decatur Railroad Company.
The election authorizing the subscription was held Feb. 1, 1870, and the subscription made Aug. 15 of that year. The bonds bear date April 20, 1871. The other facts and the provisions of the statute applicable to the case are set forth in the opinion of the court.
The case was tried by the court below without a jury, and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff for $9,207.32 and costs. The township thereupon brought the case here.
Mr. John M. Palmer for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. H. S. Greene, Mr. D. T. Littler, and Mr. James C. Robinson, contra.
The defendant in error brought this suit in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois against the township of East Oakland, to recover the amount of certain interest coupons issued with certain bonds by Charles Clement, supervisor, and as the agent of the said town, upon a subscription to the stock of the Paris and Decatur Railroad Company.
The Paris and Decatur Railroad Company is a corporation of the State of Illinois, organized under an act of the general assembly of said State, entitled 'An Act to incorporate the Paris and Decatur Railroad Company,' approved Feb. 18, 1861, with authority to construct, maintain, and operate a railroad from the town of Paris to the town of Decatur, in said State.
By the fifth section of said act it is provided that
It was by the authority of this section that the subscription we are considering was made, and the bonds and coupons issued in payment therefor. Did this language, 'the agent of any corporate body,' give power to a municipal organization to subscribe and to issue its bonds as was here done?
In the recent case of Campbell v. The Paris & Decatur Railroad Co. (not yet reported), the Supreme Court of Illinois passed upon the effect of this statute. After quoting the section as given above, the court say: We have not been furnished with a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Greer
... ... In ... Pine Grove Township v. Talcott, 19 Wall. 666, 22 L.Ed ... 227, the action was in assumpsit ... U.S. 487, 1 S.Ct. 442, 27 L.Ed. 238. See Township of East ... Oakland v. Skinner, 94 U.S. 255, 24 L.Ed. 125; Town ... of South ... ...
-
Village of Heyburn v. Security Savings & Trust Co.
... ... No county, town, township, board of education or school ... district, or other subdivision of the ... quoting with approval from Township of East Oakland v ... Skinner, 94 U.S. 255, 24 L.Ed. 125) ... It is ... ...
-
Board of Com'rs of Wilkes County v. Call
... ... v. Fulton Co., 10 Wall. 676; East Oakland Tp. v ... Skinner, 94 U.S. 255; Buchanan v. Litchfield, ... show the law,--to show that the township had no legal ... authority to make the subscription and to issue the ... ...
-
Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of Town of Oxford
... ... 287; Green ... v. Graves, 1 Doug. 351; People v. Township Board of ... La Grange, 2 Mich. 191; People v. Mahaney, 13 ... Mich. ; Steckert v. City of East Saginaw, 22 ... Mich. 104; Attorney General v. Joy, 55 Mich. 94, 20 ... v ... Graham, 130 U.S. 674, 9 S.Ct. 654; Township of East ... Oakland v. Skinner, 94 U.S. 255; 1 Dill. Mun. Corp. 545 ... The bonds, having ... ...