Toy Toy v. Hopkins
Decision Date | 23 February 1909 |
Docket Number | No. 49,49 |
Citation | 53 L.Ed. 644,212 U.S. 542,29 S.Ct. 416 |
Parties | TOY TOY, Appt., v. C. B. HOPKINS, United States Marshal for the Western District of Washington |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. A. E. Crane and F. T. Woodburn for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 543-544 intentionally omitted] Solicitor General Hoyt for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 545-546 intentionally omitted] Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court:
Toy Toy and Columbia George, both Indians of the Umatilla tribe, were jointly indicted in a state court in Oregon for the crime of murder in the first degree, committed on an Indian woman on the United States Indian reservation in Umatilla county, Oregon; were separately tried and convicted, and each sentenced to death. Columbia George appealed from the judgment of conviction on the ground, among others, that the state court was without jurisdiction, inasmuch as the crime was committed by Indians upon an Indian, on an Indian reservation, and that it was therefore within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal courts. In a careful opinion by Wolverton, J., the supreme court of the state of Oregon upheld this contention, and, reversing the judgment of the trial court, ordered the dis- charge of the defendant. State v. Columbia George, 39 Or. 127, 65 Pac. 604. Thereupon defendants were indicted under § 5339 of the Revised Statutes (U. S. Comp. Stat. 1901, p. 3627) in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Oregon. regularly tried and convicted of murder (without capital punishment), and sentenced to imprisonment for the term of their natural lives.
At October term, 1905, application was made to this court for leave to file a petition for the writ of habeas corpus, which was denied March 5, 1906, 201 U. S. 641, 50 L. ed. 901, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 759. Thereafter a petition for writ of habeas corpus on behalf of Toy Toy only was filed in the circuit court of the United States for the western district of Washington. That court denied the petition, and the case is now before this court on appeal.
The indictment in this case charged Columbia George and Toy Toy, Indians, with the murder of Annie Edna, an Indian woman, upon the Umatilla reservation, within the state and district of Oregon.
On the face of the record the United States circuit court for the district of Oregon, in which these Indians were last tried and convicted, had jurisdiction of the offense and of the defendants. They were tried, found guilty, and sentenced to the penitentiary for life. Five years thereafter Toy Toy applied for the writ of habeas corpus, and alleged that the indictment, arraignment, trial, judgment, sentence, and commitment were wholly null and void for want of jurisdiction over subject-matter and person. The petition alleged:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fireman v. U.S.
...332 U.S. at 179, 67 S.Ct. 1588, ; Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U.S. 420, 429, 32 S.Ct. 753, 56 L.Ed. 1147 (1912); Toy v. Hopkins, 212 U.S. 542, 549, 29 S.Ct. 416, 53 L.Ed. 644 (1909). Direct appeal can be a sufficient mechanism to address the validity of the law under which the information was fou......
-
Carmen, Application of
...at least when there was not affirmative showing of lack of jurisdiction upon the face of the trial court record. Toy Toy v. Hopkins, 212 U.S. 542, 29 S.Ct. 416, 53 L.Ed. 644; Davis v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 862; Hatten v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 99 F.2d 501; Ex parte Savage, CC., 159 F. 205 ......
-
Stephenson v. New Orleans & N. E. R. Co.
... ... its jurisdiction and having proceeded to judgment, its ... judgment cannot, under general principles, be attacked in ... this collateral proceeding on the grounds of its lack of ... jurisdiction ... Noble ... v. Union River Logging R. Co., 147 U.S. 165; Toy Toy v ... Hopkins, 212 U.S. 542; Burke v. Southern Pacific R ... Co., 234 U.S. 669; Hartford Life Ins. Co. v ... Johnson, 268 F. 30; Cole v. Blankenship, 30 ... F.2d 211; National Park Bank v. McKibbon & Co., 43 ... F.2d 254; Greene v. Uniacke, 46 F.2d 916; Cason ... v. Cason, 31 Miss. 578; ... ...
-
Atlantic Coast Line Co v. State of Florida State of Florida v. United States 8212 1935
...the conclusion were not embodied in the findings. Void in such a context is the equivalent of voidable. Toy Toy v. Hopkins, 212 U.S. 542, 548, 29 S.Ct. 416, 53 L.Ed. 644; Weeks v. Bridgman, 159 U.S. 541, 547, 16 S.Ct. 72, 40 L.Ed. 253; Ewell v. Daggs, 108 U.S. 143, 148, 149, 2 S.Ct. 408, 27......
-
Who Has the Body? The Paths to Habeas Corpus Reform
...lawyer. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Tinsley v. Treat, 205 U.S. 20 (1906). Townsend v. Sain, 430 U.S. 387 (1963). Toy Toy v. Hopkins, 212 U.S. 542 Tushnet, M., & Yackle, L. (1997/1998). Symbolic statutes and real laws: The pathologies of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Ac......