Trail v. State, 8 Div. 357

• Court: Alabama Court of Appeals
• Writing for the Court: HARWOOD
• Citation: Trail v. State, 103 So.2d 833, 39 Ala.App. 467 (Ala. App. 1958)
• Decision Date: 10 June 1958
• Docket Number: 8 Div. 357
• Parties: Jack TRAIL v. STATE.

Page 833

103 So.2d 833

39 Ala.App. 467

Jack TRAIL v. STATE.

8 Div. 357.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 10, 1958.

H. Neil Taylor, Russellville, for appellant.

John Patterson, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.

This appellant has been found guilty of buying, receiving, or concealing a dog, knowing the same to have been stolen, etc.

The evidence presented by the State tended to show that Mr. L. G. Malone was deer hunting in Franklin County, Alabama, on 27 November 1957. He turned loose two dogs. One, a lemon and white bitch did not return at the end of the hunt, and Mr. Malone's efforts to find her that day were fruitless.

About two weeks later the hound was seen tied up in the yard of a house that had been occupied by the appellant and his wife. As to whether the house was occupied at the time the witnesses did not know.

The above was all of the material and relevant evidence presented by the State.

The appellant's evidence was directed toward showing that he and his wife were in Texas at the time the dog was allegedly seen tied in his yard.

To constitute the offense for which this appellant has been found guilty it was encumbent on the State to show: 1. That the property had been stolen, 2. that it was bought, received, or concealed by the accused, 3. with the knowledge that the property had been stolen, and 4. with a felonious intent not to return the property to the true owner.

Even the State's own evidence shows that the dog in question was not stolen, but was lost--certainly not an unusual fate for a dog in a deer hunt.

This in itself would compel a reversal of this case, in that it was essential to...