Transamerica Life Ins. v. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins.

Decision Date10 March 2008
Docket NumberNo. C 06-110-MWB.,C 06-110-MWB.
Citation550 F.Supp.2d 865
PartiesTRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio, and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa

Glenn L. Johnson, Kevin H. Collins, Sarah J. Gayer, Shuttleworth & Ingersoll, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiffs.

Carrie Marie Raver, Dale Randall Brown, Gary C. Frust, Barnes and Thomburg LLP, Fort Wayne, IN, Denny M. Dennis, Todd A. Strother, Bradshaw Fowler Proctor Fairgrave, Des Moines, IA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF DISPUTED PATENT CLAIM TERMS

MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge.

                TABLE OF CONTENTS
                I.  INTRODUCTION .................................................................871
                      A.  Procedural Background ....................................................871
                      B.  Factual Background .......................................................873
                          1.  The parties ..........................................................873
                          2.  The patent-in-suit ...................................................873
                              a.  The inventors and dates of filing and issuance ...................873
                              b.  The Abstract and Field Of The Invention ..........................873
                              c.  The Background Of The Invention ..................................874
                              d.  The Brief Summary Of The Invention ...............................875
                              e.  The Detailed Description .........................................880
                                    i.  The description of a first method ..........................880
                                   ii.  The description of a second method .........................884
                                  iii.  Is a third method described? ...............................886
                              f.  The Flow Charts ..................................................891
                              g.  Pertinent claims of the patent ...................................891
                      C.  Agreed Constructions .....................................................892
                      D.  Disputed Constructions ...................................................893
                
                II.  LEGAL ANALYSIS ...............................................................898
                      A.  Principles Of Patent Claim Construction ..................................898
                          1.  The Phillips methodology .............................................898
                              a.  The starting point ...............................................898
                              b.  Hierarchy of evidence ............................................898
                          2.  Other canons of claim construction ...................................901
                          3.  The court's independent obligation to construe terms .................902
                          4. The court's supposed duty to determine overall scope of exclusive
                               claim coverage ......................................................903
                      B.  Agreed Constructions Of Terms Of The '201 Patent .........................905
                      C.  Disputed Constructions Of Terms Of The '201 Patent .......................905
                          1.  Claim 35: Preamble ...................................................905
                              a.  "Annuity" ........................................................905
                              b.  "Variable annuity" ...............................................906
                                    i.  Proffered constructions ....................................906
                                   ii.  Initial arguments of the parties ...........................907
                                  iii.  Tentative analysis .........................................907
                                   iv.  Oral and post-hearing arguments ............................909
                                    v.  Post-hearing analysis ......................................910
                              c.  "Systematic withdrawal program" ..................................912
                                    i.  Proffered constructions ....................................912
                                   ii.  Initial arguments of the parties ...........................912
                                  iii.  Tentative analysis .........................................913
                                   iv.  Post-hearing arguments .....................................916
                                    v.  Post-hearing analysis ......................................917
                              d.  "Guaranteed minimum payment feature associated with a
                                    systematic withdrawal program" .................................918
                                    i.  Proffered constructions ....................................918
                                   ii.  Initial arguments of the parties ...........................919
                                  iii.  Tentative analysis .........................................920
                                   iv.  Oral and post-hearing arguments ............................922
                                    v.  Post-hearing analysis ......................................923
                              e.  "Scheduled payment" ..............................................925
                                    i.  Proffered constructions ....................................925
                                   ii.  Initial arguments of the parties ...........................925
                                  iii.  Tentative analysis .........................................925
                                   iv.  Oral and post-hearing arguments ............................927
                                    v.  Post-hearing analysis ......................................929
                              f.  "Periodically determining an amount [of a scheduled
                                    payment]" ......................................................929
                                    i.  Proffered constructions ....................................929
                                   ii.  Initial arguments of the parties ...........................930
                                  iii.  Tentative analysis .........................................931
                                   iv.  Oral and post-hearing arguments ............................933
                                    v.  Post-hearing analysis ......................................934
                          2.  Claim 35: Step a .....................................................935
                              a.  "Account value" ..................................................935
                                    i.  Proffered constructions ....................................935
                                   ii.  Initial arguments of the parties ...........................935
                                  iii.  Tentative analysis .........................................936
                                   iv.  Oral and post-hearing arguments ............................936
                                    v.  Post-hearing analysis ......................................937
                              b.  "Withdrawal rate" ................................................938
                                    i.  Proffered constructions ....................................938
                                   ii.  Initial arguments of the parties ...........................938
                                  iii.  Tentative analysis .........................................939
                                   iv.  Oral and post-hearing arguments ............................940
                                    v.  Post-hearing analysis ......................................941
                
                c.  "Payout term" ....................................................942
                                    i.  Proffered constructions ....................................942
                                   ii.  Initial arguments of the parties ...........................942
                                  iii.  Tentative analysis .........................................943
                                   iv.  Oral arguments .............................................944
                                    v.  Post-hearing analysis ......................................944
                              d.  "Benefit payments" ...............................................945
                                    i.  Proffered constructions ....................................945
                                   ii.  Arguments of the parties ...................................945
                                  iii.  Analysis ...................................................945
                              e.  "Period of benefit payments" .....................................946
                                    i.  Proffered constructions ....................................946
                                   ii.  Arguments of the parties ...................................947
                                  iii.  Analysis ...................................................947
                          3.  Claim 35: Step b: "Determining an initial scheduled
                                payment" ...........................................................949
                              a.  The proffered constructions ......................................949
                              b.  Initial arguments of the parties .................................950
                              c.  Tentative analysis ...............................................950
                              d.  Oral and post-hearing arguments ..................................951
                              e.  Post-hearing analysis ............................................951
                          4.  Claim 35: Step c .....................................................952
                              a.  "Periodically determining account value" .........................952
                                    i.  Proffered constructions ....................................952
                                   ii.  Initial arguments of the parties ...........................952
                                  iii.  Tentative analysis .........................................953
                                   iv.  Oral arguments ......................:......................954
                                    v.  Post-hearing analysis ......................................954
                              b.  "Making the scheduled payment [by withdrawing that
                                    amount from the account value]" ................................955
                                    i.  Proffered
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Ca Inc. v. Simple.Com Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • March 5, 2009
    ...a correction was obvious based on relevant claim language and the “Summary of the Invention”); TransAmerica Life Ins. Co. v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 550 F.Supp.2d 865, 976 (N.D.Iowa 2008) (correcting the “erroneous insertion of the plus sign” in the relevant claim language where the ty......
  • Transamerica Life Ins. v. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • December 5, 2008
    ...INTRODUCTION A. Procedural Background In its lengthy Markman ruling on claim construction, Transamerica Life Ins. Co. v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 550 F.Supp.2d 865 (N.D.Iowa 2008), the court set out in some detail the procedural and factual background to the present litigation. The cour......
  • TRANSAMERICA LIFE INS. v. LINCOLN NAT. LIFE INS.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • March 8, 2010
    ...the parties' agreed constructions of certain terms and construed the disputed claim terms. See Transamerica Life Ins. Co. v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 550 F.Supp.2d 865 (N.D.Iowa 2008). As to the language of Claim 35 at issue here, the parties agreed that "comprising the steps of" is ope......
  • Transamerica Life Ins. v. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • January 8, 2009
    ...Regarding Construction Of Disputed Patent Claim Terms (docket no. 64) (the Markman Order). See Transamerica Life Ins. Co. v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 550 F.Supp.2d 865 (N.D.Iowa 2008). Although the court summarized its constructions of disputed patent claim terms (juxtaposed with the cl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT