Transport, Inc v. United States
Decision Date | 05 April 1965 |
Docket Number | No. 856,856 |
Parties | U. S. A. C. TRANSPORT, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Paul F. Sullivan, for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian, for the United States and others.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial15 cases
- United States v. Klaw
-
Towne Services House. Goods Transp. Co. v. United States
......802, 71 S.Ct. 68, 95 L.Ed. 590; Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 1950, 340 U.S. 474, at 496, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456.". To the same effect: Eazor Express v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., a corporation (W.D.Penn.1963), 214 F.Supp. 695; U.S. A.C. Transport, Inc. v. United States, 235 F.Supp. 689, 693 (D.Del.1964), affirmed 380 U.S. 450, 85 S.Ct. 1103, 14 L.Ed.2d 151; W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 193 F.Supp. 823, 828 (W.D.Pa.1961), affirmed 368 U.S. 6, 82 S.Ct. 16, 7 L.Ed. 2d 16; T.S.C. Motor Freight, Inc. v. United ......
- Ginzburg v. United States Mishkin v. State of New York
-
Mishkin v. State of New York
...... . This case, like Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463, 86 S.Ct. 942, also decided today, involves convictions under a criminal ......
Request a trial to view additional results