Transport, Inc v. United States

Decision Date05 April 1965
Docket NumberNo. 856,856
PartiesU. S. A. C. TRANSPORT, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Paul F. Sullivan, for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian, for the United States and others.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • United States v. Klaw
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • July 15, 1965
  • Towne Services House. Goods Transp. Co. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • July 14, 1971
    ......802, 71 S.Ct. 68, 95 L.Ed. 590; Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 1950, 340 U.S. 474, at 496, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456.".         To the same effect: Eazor Express v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., a corporation (W.D.Penn.1963), 214 F.Supp. 695; U.S. A.C. Transport, Inc. v. United States, 235 F.Supp. 689, 693 (D.Del.1964), affirmed 380 U.S. 450, 85 S.Ct. 1103, 14 L.Ed.2d 151; W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 193 F.Supp. 823, 828 (W.D.Pa.1961), affirmed 368 U.S. 6, 82 S.Ct. 16, 7 L.Ed. 2d 16; T.S.C. Motor Freight, Inc. v. United ......
  • Ginzburg v. United States Mishkin v. State of New York
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 21, 1966
  • Mishkin v. State of New York
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 21, 1966
    ...... .           This case, like Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463, 86 S.Ct. 942, also decided today, involves convictions under a criminal ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT