Trapani v. Samuels
| Decision Date | 22 April 1957 |
| Citation | Trapani v. Samuels, 161 N.Y.S.2d 648, 3 A.D.2d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957) |
| Parties | Susie TRAPANI and Dominick Trapani, Appellants, v. Lester SAMUELS and Jack Weinstein, Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Donald S. Sherwood, New York City, Jerome Golenbock, New York City, on brief, for appellants.
J. Richard Burns, New York City, for respondents.
Before WENZEL, Acting P. J., and BELDOCK, MURPHY, UGHETTA and KLEINFELD, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover damages for alleged malpractice, and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is (1) from an order dated May 3, 1956, dismissing the complaint for failure to prosecute, (2) from the judgment entered thereon, and (3) from an order dated June 6, 1956, denying a motion for reargument.
Order dated May 3, 1956, and judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The disputed claim of continuing settlement negotiations is not a sufficient explanation for the delay.
Appeal from order dated June 6, 1956, dismissed, without...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
12 cases
-
Sortino v. Fisher
...Inc., 14 A.D.2d 845, 220 N.Y.S.2d 966; Patron v. 112 East 111th Street Corp., 14 A.D.2d 843, 220 N.Y.S.2d 967; Trapani v. Samuels, 3 A.D.2d 861, 161 N.Y.S.2d 648 [2nd Dept.], lv. den. 3 N.Y.2d 931, 167 N.Y.S.2d 952, 145 N.E.2d 890; Fast v. Meenan Oil Co., Inc., 1 A.D.2d 889, 149 N.Y.S.2d 33......
-
McNamara v. Hutchinson
... ... (Wright v. Spring Lake Hotel, 20 A.D.2d 936, 248 N.Y.S.2d 910; Krell v. Pelham Syndicate, 14 A.D.2d 845, 220 N.Y.S.2d 966; Trapani v. Samuels, 3 A.D.2d 861, 161 N.Y.S.2d 648.) ... In our opinion the respondents did not demonstrate a reasonable substantial excuse ... ...
-
Selwitshka v. Glens Falls Hospital
...Syndicate, 14 A.D.2d 845, 220 N.Y.S.2d 966; Patron v. 112 East 111th St. Corp., 14 A.D.2d 843, 220 N.Y.S.2d 967; Trapani v. Samuels, 3 A.D.2d 861, 161 N.Y.S.2d 648 (2nd Dept.), mot. for lv. to app. den. 3 N.Y.2d 931, 167 N.Y.S.2d 952, 145 N.E.2d 890; Fast v. Meenan Oil Co., 1 A.D.2d 889, 14......
-
Tricarico v. Kahan
...Maizonet v. Lee Props, 11 A.D.2d 667, 201 N.Y.S.2d 751; cf. East v. Meenan Oil Co., 1 A.D.2d 889, 149 N.Y.S.2d 332; Trapani v. Samuels, 3 A.D.2d 861, 161 N.Y.S.2d 648; Krell v. Pelham Syndicate, Inc., 14 A.D.2d 845, 220 N.Y.S.2d 966) the court is constrained to observe that Section '2', sub......
Get Started for Free