Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am. v. Hirsh, No. 14-55539
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM. |
| Citation | 831 F.3d 1179 |
| Decision Date | 03 August 2016 |
| Docket Number | No. 14-55539 |
| Parties | Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Robert W. Hirsh, Defendant–Appellant, and Visemer De Gelt, LLC, Defendant. |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
In re Gawker Media LLC, Case No. 16–11700 (SMB)
...F.3d at 1189 (Watford, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc ).In his concurrence in Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am. v. Hirsh , 831 F.3d 1179 (9th Cir. 2016), joined by Judge Gould, Judge Kozinski concluded that the California anti-SLAPP statute directly conflicted with Rule 12(b)(......
-
Gottesman v. Santana, Case No.: 16–CV–2902 JLS (JLB)
...Plaintiff erroneously cites Metabolife Int'l Inc. v. Wornick , 264 F.3d 832, 845 (9th Cir. 2001), and Traveler's Casualty Ins. v. Hirsh , 831 F.3d 1179 (2016), for the proposition that the anti-SLAPP statute cannot be applied after voluntary dismissal under the federal rules. (MTS 13.) Both......
-
Alfasigma USA, Inc. v. First Databank, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-06924-HSG
...at 972–73 (quotation omitted). Yet a number of judges have questioned this holding. See, e.g. , Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am. v. Hirsh , 831 F.3d 1179, 1182–86 (9th Cir. 2016) (Kozinski, J., concurring), 1186 (Gould, J., concurring); Makaeff v. Trump Univ., LLC , 715 F.3d 254, 274–75 (9th ......
-
Pac. Dawn LLC v. Pritzker, No. 14-15224
...activity after 2003 might not count toward allocation of quota share, and participants had the opportunity to acquire additional quota 831 F.3d 1179shares. 78 Fed. Reg. 18,879 -01, 18,881. Maintaining the original control date in the final rule “rewards investments and dependence consistent......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
In re Gawker Media LLC, Case No. 16–11700 (SMB)
...F.3d at 1189 (Watford, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc ).In his concurrence in Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am. v. Hirsh , 831 F.3d 1179 (9th Cir. 2016), joined by Judge Gould, Judge Kozinski concluded that the California anti-SLAPP statute directly conflicted with Rule 12(b)(......
-
Gottesman v. Santana, Case No.: 16–CV–2902 JLS (JLB)
...Plaintiff erroneously cites Metabolife Int'l Inc. v. Wornick , 264 F.3d 832, 845 (9th Cir. 2001), and Traveler's Casualty Ins. v. Hirsh , 831 F.3d 1179 (2016), for the proposition that the anti-SLAPP statute cannot be applied after voluntary dismissal under the federal rules. (MTS 13.) Both......
-
Alfasigma USA, Inc. v. First Databank, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-06924-HSG
...at 972–73 (quotation omitted). Yet a number of judges have questioned this holding. See, e.g. , Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am. v. Hirsh , 831 F.3d 1179, 1182–86 (9th Cir. 2016) (Kozinski, J., concurring), 1186 (Gould, J., concurring); Makaeff v. Trump Univ., LLC , 715 F.3d 254, 274–75 (9th ......
-
Pac. Dawn LLC v. Pritzker, No. 14-15224
...activity after 2003 might not count toward allocation of quota share, and participants had the opportunity to acquire additional quota 831 F.3d 1179shares. 78 Fed. Reg. 18,879 -01, 18,881. Maintaining the original control date in the final rule “rewards investments and dependence consistent......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
How And When To Ask A Court To Overturn Intermediate Appellate Precedents
...against the criticism it has faced from other circuits and even Ninth Circuit judges. See, e.g., Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am. v. Hirsh, 831 F.3d 1179, 1182 (Kozinski, J. concurring). Rather, the decision merely explains the court's refusal to reverse itself. The relative merits of its pre......